Blockchain IoT Authentication Framework

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The integration of IoT devices from different providers is hindered by non-uniform identifier formats, communication protocols, and security concerns, leading to high construction costs and increased security risks, such as data tampering and potential safety hazards.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a blockchain-based system with a uniform device identifier specification and public key-private key pairs for IoT devices, allowing for secure authentication and data exchange across different providers, while ensuring data integrity and interoperability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If centralized control centers are established by each device provider to manage IoT devices, then device management capability is improved, but construction costs increase and system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice management capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the device management functions from multiple centralized control centers into a single distributed blockchain system. Instead of each provider maintaining separate control centers, the system uses a shared blockchain platform where device identification, authentication, and data management are handled collectively, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining management capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The blockchain-based device identifier specification serves multiple functions simultaneously: it provides uniform identification across different providers, enables authentication, ensures data integrity, and facilitates interoperability. This multi-functional approach eliminates the need for separate specialized systems for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If uniform device identifier specifications are implemented across all IoT devices, then interoperability is improved, but device complexity increases due to standard compliance requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveinteroperabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the fundamental parameter of device identification from provider-specific formats to a unified blockchain-based identifier system. By transitioning to this new parameter standard, the system achieves interoperability across different providers while the blockchain infrastructure handles the complexity of standard compliance centrally.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If control centers have absolute control over IoT device data, then data management capability is improved, but security risks increase due to potential data tampering

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata management capabilityVSAvoidsecurity risks
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The blockchain acts as an intermediary between control centers and IoT device data. Instead of control centers having direct absolute control, the blockchain mediates data storage and access through its distributed ledger, which provides transparency and immutability. This intermediary layer prevents data tampering while maintaining effective data management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The blockchain system provides continuous feedback on data integrity through its immutable ledger. Any attempted data tampering is immediately detectable as the blockchain maintains a permanent record of all data transactions, creating a feedback mechanism that prevents and detects security breaches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Adaptability or versatility

If multiple provider-specific control centers are used to manage IoT devices, then provider autonomy is improved, but construction costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprovider autonomyVSAvoidconstruction costs
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple provider-specific control center functions into a single blockchain-based system that all providers can access. This consolidation reduces the total construction cost by eliminating redundant infrastructure while maintaining provider autonomy through the decentralized nature of the blockchain, where each provider can manage their devices independently without requiring separate control centers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS11546173B2Methods, application server, IoT device and media for implementing IoT services
Publication Date: 2023.01.03 VECHAIN GLOBAL TECH S AR L
  • US11546173B2 patent drawing
  • US11546173B2 patent drawing
  • US11546173B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method is disclosed for implementing trust Internet of Things (IoT) services in an IoT device and a user device. The IoT device receives from the user device an authentication request comprising a hash value, first encrypted information and second encrypted information, where the IoT device determines whether the user device is successfully authenticated based on determining the user device public key and confirming that the user device public key exists in a list of access permitted user devices of the IoT device.