Blockchain Distributed Ledger for Electronic Agreement Management

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Enterprises face challenges in managing multiple licensing agreements, including duplication of licenses, unoptimized costs, and the lack of a single source of truth for all licenses, which hinders collaboration and efficiency across organizational teams.

Innovation Solution

A blockchain distributed ledger system is used to manage electronic agreements, enabling permissioned access for internal and external entities, with smart contracts for license creation, modification, and bidding, providing an immutable and accurate record of transactions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional centralized license management systems are used, then implementation complexity is low, but data accuracy and trustworthiness deteriorate due to lack of single source of truth

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the centralized license management function into multiple distributed nodes (enterprise entities and vendor entities). Each node maintains its own license ledger, but all nodes reference a common distributed ledger structure. This segmentation eliminates the single point of failure and provides multiple sources of truth that can be cross-validated, improving data accuracy while distributing system complexity across multiple independent entities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The distributed ledger acts as an intermediary between enterprise entities and vendor entities. It provides a common reference framework that mediates license transactions, ensuring data consistency across all participants. The intermediary mechanism (distributed ledger protocol) resolves data accuracy issues without requiring direct complex interactions between all entities, thus managing system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Loss of information

If multiple separate license tracking systems are maintained by different organizational teams, then operational flexibility is high, but information availability and collaboration deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation availabilityVSAvoidsystem integration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges previously separate license tracking systems into a unified distributed ledger framework. Enterprise entities and vendor entities all access and write to the same distributed ledger, consolidating information that was previously siloed in separate systems. This merging improves information availability across organizational teams while the modular nature of distributed ledgers manages integration complexity through standardized protocols.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The distributed ledger provides universal access and functionality across all enterprise entities and vendor entities. A single platform serves multiple purposes: license tracking, cost optimization, collaboration, and data sharing. This multi-functionality eliminates the need for multiple separate systems, improving information availability while reducing overall system integration complexity through a single universal infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Quantity of substance

If licenses are not centrally optimized, then operational autonomy is maintained, but cost efficiency deteriorates due to duplication

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelicense optimizationVSAvoidmanagement complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The distributed ledger implements feedback mechanisms where license transactions, usage patterns, and cost data are continuously recorded and made available to all entities. This feedback enables entities to optimize license allocations based on real-time data about duplication and usage efficiency. The feedback loop improves cost efficiency while the automated nature of distributed ledger processing reduces manual management complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

Entities use the distributed ledger to autonomously manage and optimize their own licenses while benefiting from enterprise-wide optimization. The system enables self-service license management with built-in optimization capabilities through the shared data framework. Entities can independently make optimization decisions based on comprehensive data availability, improving cost efficiency without requiring complex centralized control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS11397919B1Electronic agreement data management architecture with blockchain distributed ledger
Publication Date: 2022.07.26 EMC IP HLDG CO LLC
  • US11397919B1 patent drawing
  • US11397919B1 patent drawing
  • US11397919B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A distributed ledger is maintained in accordance with an enterprise. The distributed ledger includes a plurality of nodes such that one or more entities internal to the enterprise and one or more entities external to the enterprise each have access to at least one of the plurality of nodes. Electronic agreements (for example, product/service licenses) between at least a portion of the one or more entities internal to the enterprise and at least a portion of the one or more entities external to the enterprise are managed in association with the distributed ledger. Management includes generating and recording transactions associated with the electronic agreements on the distributed ledger to enable the one or more entities internal to the enterprise and the one or more entities external to the enterprise permissioned access to one or more of the recorded transactions.