Blockchain Node Recovery Using ECHO-Based State Reconstruction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing Byzantine Fault Tolerance (BFT) mechanisms in blockchain networks are inefficient, leading to increased latency and complexity due to network bottlenecks and the inability to promptly recover from faulty nodes, especially when using round robin methods for leader node changes.

Innovation Solution

Implementing improved consensus mechanisms that convert transaction requests into erasure code blocks, assigning weights to consensus process phases, and using an epoch change process based on weight sums to select a new primary node, while also facilitating a recovery process that does not disrupt normal network operations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If existing BFT mechanisms are used for consensus among network nodes, then reliability is maintained, but latency increases and network efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconsensus reliabilityVSAvoidconsensus latency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The consensus process is segmented into distinct phases (prepare, commit, revert) with clearly defined transition conditions. Each phase has specific validation rules, allowing nodes to efficiently progress through the consensus steps without redundant verification, thereby reducing overall latency while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary validation of transactions and pre-processes consensus data during the prepare phase before final commitment. By preparing and validating data in advance, the system reduces the time required for final consensus decisions, addressing the latency issue while preserving reliability through staged verification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Device complexity

If round robin method is used for primary node selection, then simplicity is maintained, but system reliability deteriorates due to inability to avoid faulty nodes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenode selection complexityVSAvoidprimary node reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where nodes report their status and transaction processing results. The primary node selection and continuation depend on feedback from the prepare and commit phases - if validation fails or timeouts occur, the system automatically triggers a revert and selects a new primary node, ensuring faulty nodes are avoided while maintaining manageable complexity through rule-based decisions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If recovery process is initiated for faulty network node, then system reliability is improved, but normal consensus operations are disrupted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenode recovery capabilityVSAvoidconsensus throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The recovery process is extracted as a separate, isolated procedure that does not interfere with ongoing consensus operations. Faulty nodes are identified and taken out of the active consensus process through the revert mechanism, allowing their recovery to be handled independently through state reconstruction from valid ECHO messages, while healthy nodes continue normal operations without disruption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Adaptability or versatility

If traditional consensus mechanisms are used, then compatibility is maintained, but network bandwidth usage increases and memory burden grows

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanism compatibilityVSAvoidnetwork bandwidth consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses cryptographic hashing to create compact representations (copies) of transaction data. Instead of transmitting and storing full transaction details, nodes exchange hash values that serve as verified copies, dramatically reducing network bandwidth consumption and memory requirements while maintaining compatibility with existing blockchain structures through the use of standard hash functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentEP3748906B1Performing a recovery process for a network node in a distributed system
Publication Date: 2021.12.01 ADVANCED NEW TECHNOLOGIES CO LTD
  • EP3748906B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3748906B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3748906B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A method for performing a recovery process of a network node of a blockchain network includes broadcasting a state request message by the network node to the other network nodes of the blockchain network to recover a target transaction of a target sequence number, receiving state reply messages that each includes a sequence number from the other network nodes, identifying the target sequence number based on the sequence numbers in the state reply messages, sending a requesting message to the other network nodes to request an ECHO message from each of the other network nodes, determining a number of valid ECHO messages that are sent by the other network nodes, recovering the target transaction based on the number of valid ECHO messages, and sending a message to the other network nodes indicating that the network node has been recovered.