Blockchain P2P Content Sharing Illegal Content Blocking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Blockchain-based P2P content sharing networks face challenges in managing and deleting illegal or bad content due to their distributed nature, making it difficult to block or remove such content effectively.

Innovation Solution

A user device and an administrator device are configured within the blockchain network to generate, verify, and block illegal content through P2P communication, using block information and an artificial intelligence model to identify and manage reported content, ensuring that illegal content is deleted and its distribution is halted.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If content is distributed and stored in multiple electronic apparatuses in a blockchain network, then content sharing capability is improved, but the ability to delete or modify illegal content deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontent sharing capabilityVSAvoidcontent deletion capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments content management into two distinct parts: (1) immutable blockchain storage for verification and tracking, and (2) mutable local storage on user devices for deletion. When illegal content is identified, the system generates deletion instructions that are stored on the blockchain, while actual deletion occurs locally on each user's device. This segmentation allows content to be widely distributed for sharing while maintaining the ability to delete it from individual devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary mechanism in the form of deletion instructions and verification codes. Instead of directly modifying distributed content, the system uses blockchain-stored deletion instructions as intermediaries that trigger local deletion actions. These intermediaries bridge the gap between the immutable blockchain ledger and the mutable local content storage, enabling centralized deletion control in a distributed system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Extent of automation

If a blockchain network operates without a central administrator for P2P content sharing, then system autonomy and decentralization are improved, but the ability to manage and block illegal content deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem autonomyVSAvoidillegal content management
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements multi-functionality by enabling regular user devices to perform administrator-like functions. Users can report illegal content, and their reports are verified and processed by the decentralized network. The system universally allows any participant to contribute to content moderation through reporting mechanisms, while maintaining system autonomy without requiring a dedicated central administrator for every operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system establishes feedback loops where users report illegal content, the network verifies these reports through blockchain consensus, and deletion instructions are generated and distributed back to relevant devices. This feedback mechanism enables autonomous content management by continuously cycling through detection, verification, and correction actions without central intervention, while still achieving effective illegal content blocking.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If content verification and blocking mechanisms are added to a blockchain P2P network, then illegal content blocking capability is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveillegal content blocking capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts complex verification and blocking logic from individual user devices and places it in the decentralized blockchain network itself. Instead of requiring each device to independently analyze and block illegal content, the system extracts these functions to the network level where consensus mechanisms handle verification. Individual devices only need to implement simple reporting and instruction-following capabilities, significantly reducing device complexity while maintaining strong blocking capability at the network level.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS11659031B2Blockchain based peer-to-peer content sharing apparatus for blocking illegal contents
Publication Date: 2023.05.23 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD
  • US11659031B2 patent drawing
  • US11659031B2 patent drawing
  • US11659031B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A user device configured to operate in a blockchain network includes a communicator; a memory; and a processor configured to: based on a peer-to-peer communication based content being received from at least one of a plurality of external apparatuses constituting the blockchain network, generate, through the communicator, block information related to the received content, store the generated block information in the memory, and transmit, through the communicator, the generated block information to the blockchain network; based on a user command for reporting the received content being received, transmit information on the reported content to the blockchain network; identify, based on verification on the reported content performed by at least one administrator device from among the plurality of external apparatuses, whether or not the reported content corresponds to an illegal content; and based on the reported content corresponding to the illegal content, block distribution of the received content.