Blockchain Distribution System for Research Contribution Tracking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current systems lack effective platforms for incentivizing collaboration and sharing in scientific research, often rewarding only entities that achieve outcomes, leaving contributors without fair recognition or reward, despite their essential contributions.

Innovation Solution

A distribution system that utilizes directed graphs and blockchain technology to track contributions among research entities, generating a collaboration network where nodes represent entities and edges represent relationships, allowing for equitable reward distribution based on contribution levels.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional reward systems are used in scientific research, then only entities that achieve outcomes receive rewards, but contributors without outcomes receive no recognition or reward

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefairness of reward distributionVSAvoidcontribution tracking accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a blockchain as an intermediary system to track and verify contributions of research entities. The blockchain records collaboration data, citation relationships, and contribution metrics in a transparent and immutable manner, enabling fair reward distribution without requiring direct verification of each contribution's impact.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms by continuously monitoring and recording contribution data from research entities, publishing results, and citing works. This feedback loop allows the system to automatically determine contribution levels and distribute rewards based on verified collaboration metrics, ensuring fairness in reward distribution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Loss of information

If collaboration networks are tracked using traditional databases, then contribution data can be stored, but the system lacks transparency and trust in contribution measurement

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontribution data transparencyVSAvoidcollaboration tracking system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The blockchain serves as a transparent intermediary that records contribution data in a publicly verifiable manner. Each transaction and contribution is immutably stored, allowing any participant to verify the accuracy and transparency of contribution tracking without requiring complex centralized authentication systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables research entities to self-record and self-verify their own contributions and collaborations on the blockchain. This self-service mechanism reduces the need for complex external verification systems while maintaining high transparency and trust in contribution measurement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If rewards are distributed based on outcome achievement, then successful research gets recognized, but the motivation for collaboration and sharing is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresearch output efficiencyVSAvoidcollaboration incentive erosion
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors collaboration activities, citation relationships, and contribution metrics, providing real-time feedback to research entities about their collaborative impact. This feedback motivates researchers to engage in meaningful collaboration and knowledge sharing, as their contributions are transparently tracked and rewarded based on actual collaborative outcomes rather than individual success alone.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the reward distribution parameters from binary outcome-based rewards to continuous contribution-based rewards. By measuring and rewarding contributions along multiple dimensions (collaboration depth, knowledge sharing, citation impact), the system creates sustained motivation for collaboration while maintaining research productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11158098B2Accelerating data-driven scientific discovery
Publication Date: 2021.10.26 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US11158098B2 patent drawing
  • US11158098B2 patent drawing
  • US11158098B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques facilitating using a distribution system for incentivizing and accelerating data driven scientific research are described herein. The distribution system can track the input of various parties involved in scientific research, and when a reward, monetary or otherwise, is realized for one or more outcomes of the scientific research, the distribution system can distribute the reward among the parties that provided the input. The relative levels and contributions of the parties can be tracked to ensure that an equitable portioning of the reward is realized. A directed graph can be formed based on the transactions, wherein the nodes correspond to entities, researchers, publications, and the edges correspond to relationships between the entities. The directed graph can be analyzed to determine the relative or absolute levels of contributions from each of the entities, and the rewards can be distributed based on the contribution levels.