Blockchain Security Layer for Automated Network Policy Configuration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing blockchain network deployments are complex and lack automation in managing infrastructure security, with manual configuration processes being error-prone and time-consuming, and they face challenges in isolating data, ensuring confidentiality, and providing restricted access.

Innovation Solution

A system that includes a security layer capable of automatically configuring blockchain networks by generating security configuration files based on blockchain specification information, launching the blockchain on a host platform, and dynamically setting security settings using modules to ensure data isolation, confidentiality, and restricted access.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If manual configuration processes are used for blockchain infrastructure security, then flexibility in customization is improved, but time consumption and error rate increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconfiguration flexibilityVSAvoidconfiguration time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service automation where the blockchain deployment system automatically configures security infrastructure components (network policies, security groups, firewall rules) based on deployment specifications, eliminating the need for manual administrator intervention while maintaining adaptability to different blockchain network requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary action by pre-defining security configuration templates and policies that are automatically applied during blockchain deployment, preparing security infrastructure in advance based on deployment specifications before the actual blockchain network is established

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Adaptability or versatility

If manual configuration processes are used for blockchain infrastructure security, then customization capability is improved, but error rate increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecustomization capabilityVSAvoidconfiguration accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service automation where the blockchain deployment system automatically configures security infrastructure components (network policies, security groups, firewall rules) based on deployment specifications, eliminating the need for manual administrator intervention while maintaining adaptability to different blockchain network requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms to validate security configuration correctness, automatically detecting and correcting configuration errors, and providing verification that security policies are properly applied, thereby improving reliability while maintaining customization capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If automated security configuration is implemented, then time consumption is reduced, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconfiguration speedVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses an intermediary security configuration service that sits between the blockchain deployment system and infrastructure components, automatically translating deployment specifications into security configurations and managing the complexity of security policy management, thus improving productivity while containing system complexity through abstraction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Adaptability or versatility

If blockchain networks span organizational boundaries and clouds, then versatility of deployment is improved, but security management complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeployment versatilityVSAvoidsecurity management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements universal security configuration capabilities that work across multiple cloud providers and organizational boundaries, providing a unified approach to security management that adapts to different deployment environments (public cloud, private cloud, hybrid, multi-cloud) without requiring environment-specific manual configuration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses an intermediary security configuration service that sits between the blockchain deployment system and infrastructure components, automatically translating deployment specifications into security configurations and managing the complexity of security policy management, thus improving productivity while containing system complexity through abstraction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS12425453B2Security layer for configuring blockchain
Publication Date: 2025.09.23 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US12425453B2 patent drawing
  • US12425453B2 patent drawing
  • US12425453B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An example operation may include one or more of receiving blockchain specification information, generating one or more security configuration files for a blockchain based on the blockchain specification information, and launching the blockchain on a host platform, and hooking into the host platform via one or more modules which configure security settings of the blockchain based on the one or more security configuration files.