Blockchain Smart Contracting for Automated Inventory Management

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current inventory management systems for retailers are inefficient due to manual reordering processes and automated systems that often lock retailers into unfavorable pricing and purchase terms with a single supplier, failing to optimize for best deals across multiple vendors.

Innovation Solution

Implementing blockchain smart contracting to automate the matching of purchase requests with suitable vendors, generating contracts, and storing them on a blockchain data structure for immediate, machine-verifiable authenticity and automatic fulfillment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If automated reordering is implemented with a single supplier, then reordering efficiency is improved, but retailers are locked into unfavorable pricing and purchase terms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereordering efficiencyVSAvoidflexibility in pricing and purchase terms
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically selects suppliers based on real-time evaluation of multiple vendors' pricing, availability, and terms. The automated reordering system is not fixed to a single supplier but can adaptively change supplier selection for each purchase request, resolving the contradiction between automation efficiency and flexibility in pricing terms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms that continuously evaluate supplier performance, pricing, and product availability. This feedback loop enables the automated system to learn from past purchases and optimize future supplier selections, maintaining both high reordering efficiency and adaptability to favorable pricing terms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Adaptability or versatility

If manual reordering processes are used, then flexibility in selecting suppliers is maintained, but inefficiencies and time consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesupplier selection flexibilityVSAvoidtime consumption in reordering
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service automated reordering where the system automatically monitors inventory levels, generates purchase requests, evaluates supplier options, and executes purchases without manual intervention. This resolves the contradiction by making the system serve itself with automated supplier selection, eliminating time consumption while maintaining flexibility through algorithmic supplier evaluation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical reordering processes with an automated digital system that uses algorithms and data processing to evaluate suppliers and execute purchases. This substitution eliminates the time-consuming manual aspects while preserving supplier selection flexibility through automated comparison and selection based on multiple criteria.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If blockchain smart contracting is implemented, then contract authenticity and fulfillment automation are improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontract authenticityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses a universal blockchain platform that provides multiple functions including contract creation, authentication, storage, and automated fulfillment execution. This multi-functional approach reduces the need for separate systems for each function, thereby managing complexity while delivering reliable contract authenticity and automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The blockchain acts as an intermediary layer that mediates between the purchase request system and the fulfillment process. It provides a trusted, decentralized mechanism for contract authentication and execution without requiring complex point-to-point verification systems between all parties, thus improving reliability while managing complexity through a standardized intermediary protocol.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS10824988B2Automated inventory management including blockchain smart contracting
Publication Date: 2020.11.03 NCR VOYIX CORP
  • US10824988B2 patent drawing
  • US10824988B2 patent drawing
  • US10824988B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Various embodiments each include at least one of systems, methods, software, and data structures for automated inventory management including blockchain smart contracting. One such embodiment in the form of a method includes maintaining a database of products available for purchase from vendors, receiving a data representation of a purchase request for a desired product from a buying entity, and finding a match between the purchase request and vendor of the desired product. This method may then generate a data representation of a contract between the buying entity and the vendor of the match followed by generating a hash of the data representation of the contract and adding the data representation of the contract and the generated hash to a blockchain data structure. A copy of the block chain data structure may then be stored and forwarded to at least each of the contracting parties.