Blockchain Ticketing System for Electronic Gaming Machines

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional coinless ticketing systems in electronic gaming machines rely on a client/server architecture, which poses technical challenges such as system reliability and security issues like hacking and regulatory compliance.

Innovation Solution

A blockchain-based ticketing system is introduced, where electronic gaming machines participate in a blockchain network, utilizing local and system blockchains to create and manage ticketing transactions, thereby decentralizing the ticketing process and enhancing security and transparency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a client/server architecture is used for ticketing systems, then ease of operation and centralized control are improved, but system reliability and security deteriorate due to single point of failure and hacking risks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecentralized controlVSAvoidsystem reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the centralized ticketing system into distributed nodes across a blockchain network. Each node maintains its own copy of the ticketing data and can independently validate transactions, eliminating the single point of failure in client/server architectures while maintaining operational ease through standardized protocols.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The blockchain acts as an intermediary layer between ticketing operations and storage. Instead of direct client-server communication, transactions are broadcast to the network, validated by consensus mechanisms, and recorded immutably, providing both decentralization and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If a client/server architecture is used for ticketing systems, then ease of operation and centralized control are improved, but security deteriorates due to hacking risks and regulatory compliance issues

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecentralized controlVSAvoidsecurity risks
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary validation and consensus checking before finalizing any ticketing transaction. Multiple nodes verify transaction legitimacy in advance, preventing malicious actions before they can compromise system security, while maintaining ease of operation through automated validation rules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The blockchain consensus mechanism serves as an intermediary security layer that mediates between ticketing operations and system integrity. Transactions must pass through multiple validation stages involving different nodes, making hacking attempts detectable and preventable while preserving operational simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If a blockchain-based ticketing system is implemented, then system reliability and security are improved through decentralization, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem reliabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a universal blockchain protocol that handles multiple ticketing operations (issuance, transfer, redemption, validation) through a single standardized framework. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate complex systems while maintaining high reliability through consistent application of the same proven protocol across all operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Object-affected harmful factors

If a blockchain-based ticketing system is implemented, then security and transparency are improved, but loss of time increases due to distributed consensus processing

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoidtransaction processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements partial consensus mechanisms where not all nodes must validate every transaction fully. Instead, a sufficient subset of nodes performs validation to achieve the required security level, reducing processing time while maintaining adequate security and transparency through selective verification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20250174082A1Ticketing systems on a distributed ledger
Publication Date: 2025.05.29 ARISTOCRAT TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • US20250174082A1 patent drawing
  • US20250174082A1 patent drawing
  • US20250174082A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A blockchain system for providing ticketing within a blockchain network of participating electronic devices includes an electronic gaming machine (EGM) configured to participate in the blockchain network. The EGM a memory storing a local blockchain and a system blockchain. The EGM also includes at least one processor configured to execute instructions which, when executed, cause the at least one processor to identify a first ticket creation blockchain transaction in the local blockchain from a ticket creation device of the first plurality of electronic gaming devices, the first ticket creation blockchain transaction including at least a ticket value and a ticket identifier (ID), create a system ticket creation blockchain transaction including at least the ticket value and the ticket ID, and broadcast the system ticket creation blockchain transaction to the system blockchain.