Blockchain Verification with Encrypted Security Certifications

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing blockchain and distributed ledger systems face security vulnerabilities that compromise their trustworthiness and integrity, necessitating mechanisms to ensure privacy and authorization of security statements, enable secure validation and encryption, and facilitate rollback and re-certification in case of breaches.

Innovation Solution

A mechanism for blockchain participants to publish and encrypt security certifications, allowing only authorized entities to read, with a security verification service that performs time-based analysis to determine trustworthiness, enabling rollback and re-certification, and includes hardware-based encryption for secure communication.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If security certifications are published to the blockchain, then transparency and verification capability are improved, but privacy and security of sensitive information deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:

Improveverification capabilityVSAvoidprivacy

Core Design Contradiction:

ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments security certification information into multiple components: public verification data (hashes, timestamps, certification status) that can be published to the blockchain, and private sensitive data (security vulnerabilities, detailed audit findings, confidential information) that remains encrypted and accessible only to authorized parties. This segmentation allows simultaneous achievement of transparency for verification and privacy for sensitive information.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces cryptographic intermediaries including hash functions, digital signatures, and encrypted data structures that act as mediators between the need for public verification and the need for private information protection. These intermediaries enable verification of security certifications without exposing the underlying sensitive information, resolving the contradiction between transparency and privacy.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If all security information is made accessible for verification, then security validation thoroughness is improved, but exposure to potential attackers and security risks worsens

Engineering Contradiction:

Improvesecurity validation thoroughnessVSAvoidsecurity risks

Core Design Contradiction:

Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by providing different levels of information access to different entities based on their authorization and role. Authorized validators receive comprehensive security information for thorough verification, while potential attackers only access publicly published hashed and encrypted data that lacks the sensitivity of the original information. This differentiated information distribution maintains validation thoroughness while minimizing security risks.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #3Local quality

3Ease of operation

If security certifications are stored in plaintext on the blockchain, then readability and verification ease are improved, but vulnerability to attacks and unauthorized access worsens

Engineering Contradiction:

Improveverification easeVSAvoidsecurity

Core Design Contradiction:

Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses cryptographic copying where the original security certification data is replaced by its hash representation on the blockchain. The hash serves as a verifiable copy that proves the existence and integrity of the original data without exposing the sensitive information itself. Verification is performed by comparing hashes rather than examining plaintext content, maintaining ease of verification while enhancing security.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #26Copying

4Reliability

If rollback mechanism is implemented to address security breaches, then system recovery capability is improved, but complexity of managing security certifications and trust worsens

Engineering Contradiction:

Improvesystem recovery capabilityVSAvoidmanagement complexity

Core Design Contradiction:

ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary action by pre-establishing cryptographic anchors and trust markers in the blockchain before security breaches occur. These pre-deployed verification mechanisms enable automated rollback detection and execution without requiring complex real-time decision-making during incidents. The system proactively prepares verification states that simplify post-breach recovery operations.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12481987B2Verification systems for blockchains and distributed ledgers

Publication Date: 2025.11.25 CIPHERTRACE INC

AI summary

Provided herein are exemplary systems and methods for creating a secure self-validating network of blockchain/distributed ledger participants. Some exemplary mechanisms support self-validation, mutual-validation, external-validation and privacy controls. Such mechanisms enable the deployment and continued operation of large scale blockchain and distributed ledger systems with a self-certifying security system. They create the ability for rules to be codified to control the rights, privileges and access of nodes depending on their self-certification and external-certification. Also provided is an audit trail of these certifications which can be used for liability claims, insurance, security analytics and forensics.