Blocker Plate Additive Manufacturing Chamber

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

As additive manufacturing processes produce larger parts, the accumulation of excess powdered material becomes significant, increasing the size and weight borne by the manufacturing machine's components, leading to higher costs and complexity in controlling the fabrication process.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a blocker plate with a sidewall barrier in the additive manufacturing machine, which blocks excess material from falling onto the work surface and directs it to a removal system, reducing the load on the machine's actuator and allowing precise incremental movement for accurate layer deposition.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Volume of moving object

If larger parts are fabricated in additive manufacturing, then part size and manufacturing capability are improved, but excess powdered material accumulation increases machine weight and complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepart sizeVSAvoidmachine weight
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSWeight of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The work chamber is segmented into a fabrication zone and an excess material containment zone using a containment structure. This allows excess material to be isolated in a separate region, preventing it from adding weight to the moving work surface while still allowing large parts to be fabricated.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Excess material is extracted and removed from the fabrication zone using a removal device. This prevents accumulation of excess material on the work surface, maintaining reduced weight on moving components while enabling continued fabrication of large parts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Volume of moving object

If larger parts are fabricated in additive manufacturing, then part fabrication capability is improved, but control complexity and costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepart sizeVSAvoidcontrol complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the chamber into distinct zones with a containment structure, the system simplifies control of excess material. The containment structure passively directs excess material to a removal device, reducing the complexity of active control systems needed to manage material distribution in large chambers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Ease of manufacture

If excess material is allowed to accumulate on work surface, then material deposition is simplified, but interference with part geometry and precision occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial depositionVSAvoidpart geometry precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The containment structure extracts and isolates excess material from the fabrication zone, directing it to a removal device. This maintains the simplicity of material deposition while preventing excess material from interfering with part geometry, thereby preserving manufacturing precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The containment structure acts as an intermediary between the material deposition process and the part fabrication zone. It allows material to be deposited freely while mediating to prevent excess material from reaching and interfering with the part geometry.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration effectively manages excess material, reducing the load on the machine's components, maintaining precise control and feasibility in fabricating larger parts by preventing excess material from interfering with the part geometry and allowing for efficient removal, thus enhancing the economic viability and capability of the process.

Implementation Method 1

directing energy on portions of the deposited material according to a defined part geometry

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSelective melting: Melting

Implementation Method 2

a blocker plate disposed between the material applicator and the work surface for blocking a portion of material deposited by the material applicator

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhysical blocking: Physical Containment

Data Source

PatentEP2711110A3Reduced build mass additive manufacturing chamber
Publication Date: 2017.05.10 AEROJET ROCKETDYNE OF DE INC
  • EP2711110A3 patent drawing
  • EP2711110A3 patent drawing
  • EP2711110A3 patent drawing

AI summary

A disclosed additive manufacturing machine (10) includes a work surface (16) for supporting fabrication of part (18) and a housing (50) defining a chamber (48) over the work surface (16). A material applicator (24) supported on the housing (50) deposits material (26) onto the work surface (16) and a blocker plate (40) disposed between the material applicator (24) and the work surface (16) for blocking a portion of material (26) deposited by the material applicator (24). An energy directing device (20) is supported on the housing (50) and directing energy (22) within the chamber (48) to form the part (18).