Electro-Mechanical Blocking Actuator Slit Design

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing electro-mechanical blocking actuators are vulnerable to manipulation, such as sudden external forces, which can cause unintended displacement of the slider and unlocking of access control devices.

Innovation Solution

The electro-mechanical blocking actuator features a housing, spindle, and electric driver with a cylindrical sleeve having a slit and a helical spring, where the sleeve is movable between blocking and non-blocking positions, and the slit's angled design prevents unwanted displacement by redirecting force back to the blocked position.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If a helical spring is used to store energy for moving the slider, then the actuator can move the slider without re-activation of the motor, but the actuator becomes vulnerable to manipulation by sudden external forces causing unwanted displacement

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy storage efficiencyVSAvoidresistance to manipulation
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a dynamic blocking mechanism where a blocking element can move between a first position (blocking the slider) and a second position (allowing slider movement). This dynamic structure allows the actuator to switch between locked and unlocked states, preventing manipulation while maintaining energy storage capability. The blocking element responds to motor activation to change positions, providing active protection against unauthorized manipulation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the state parameter of the blocking element between two distinct positions. In the first position, the blocking element physically obstructs the slider's movement path, preventing any displacement regardless of spring force. When the motor is activated, the blocking element transitions to the second position, allowing the stored spring energy to move the slider. This parameter change (position state) resolves the contradiction by controlling when the stored energy can act on the slider.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If the slider can be moved freely by spring energy, then the actuator operates smoothly between blocking and non-blocking positions, but sudden external forces can compress the spring and cause unintended unlocking

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveslider movement smoothnessVSAvoidexternal force vulnerability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary anti-action by positioning the blocking element in the first position before any external force is applied. This blocking element pre-empts potential harmful effects by physically preventing the slider from moving, even if the spring is compressed by external forces. The blocking element acts as a preliminary barrier that must be removed (by motor activation) before the slider can respond to any forces, including harmful external forces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Solution Approach 2:

The blocking element serves as an intermediary between the spring and the slider. Instead of allowing the spring to directly act on the slider (which would permit manipulation), the blocking element mediates this interaction. When in the first position, it decouples the spring's potential energy from the slider, preventing unauthorized movement. The intermediary blocking element thus protects the system while allowing controlled operation when the blocking element is in the second position.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Stability of the object's composition

If a pin is fixed through the sleeve to the housing, then the sleeve is constrained in radial direction, but the sleeve can still be displaced axially by spring force causing manipulation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesleeve radial stabilityVSAvoidaxial position security
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the constraint function into two independent components: the pin provides radial constraint (first function), while the blocking element provides axial constraint (second function). This segmentation allows each component to specialize in one direction of constraint without interfering with the other. The pin maintains sleeve stability in the radial direction, while the blocking element independently prevents axial displacement, together providing comprehensive positional security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies asymmetry by using different constraint mechanisms for different directions. The pin (cylindrical element) naturally constrains radial movement through its geometry, while the blocking element (separate component) constrains axial movement. This asymmetric approach uses the most appropriate mechanism for each directional constraint, optimizing both radial stability and axial security without over-constraining the system in a symmetric manner.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The actuator is more robust against forceful manipulation, ensuring the access control device remains locked even under impulse forces, such as hammering, by using the helical spring to maintain the sleeve in the blocked position without transitioning to the non-blocking state.

Implementation Method 1

a buffer system is created in which energy can be stored within the spring

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic energy storage: Spring

Implementation Method 2

the spring is compressed and drives the slider to move to the right

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHelical spring compression: Compression

Data Source

PatentEP2963212B1An electro-mechanical blocking actuator and an access control device
Publication Date: 2017.08.09 OPTILOX
  • EP2963212B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2963212B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2963212B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

An electro-mechanical blocking actuator (1) is provided comprising a housing (2), a spindle (3) and an electric driver (4) arranged to rotate the spindle and a helical spring (9) around a rotation axis(5). A substantially cylindrical sleeve (6) is arranged between the housing and the spindle. The sleeve comprises a slit (7). The sleeve is movable between a blocking position and a non-blocking position. If the electric driver rotates the spindle and the helical spring in a certain rotational direction, the helical spring will act on the coupling means (10) so as to drive the sleeve in a certain co-axial direction from the blocking position to the non-blocking position and vice versa. The slit comprises a first and second slit portion (71', 71"), the second slit portion making an angle α relative to the first slit portion at the transition point, where α ≤ 90 degrees.