Blocking probes for analyte binding specificity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for analyzing spatial heterogeneity in biological samples face challenges in enhancing the specificity of analyte binding, particularly when a second capture step is involved, as they fail to effectively address background noise and premature hybridization of capture binding domains with capture probes, leading to reduced sensitivity and specificity.

Innovation Solution

The method involves using a substrate with capture probes featuring spatial barcodes and capture domains, where the capture binding domain is initially blocked using blocking probes or artificial nucleic acids like caged nucleotides, allowing for controlled hybridization and enhanced specificity of analyte binding by preventing premature interactions and releasing the block at the appropriate time for specific binding.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the capture binding domain is left unblocked to increase binding efficiency, then the capture efficiency improves, but background noise increases due to premature hybridization with capture probes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecapture efficiencyVSAvoidbackground noise
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The capture binding domain is pre-blocked with a blocking probe before the analyte binding assay is performed. This preliminary blocking action prevents premature hybridization between the capture binding domain and capture probes on the substrate, thereby reducing background noise while maintaining high capture efficiency when the blocking probe is subsequently removed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

A blocking probe is introduced as an intermediary molecule that temporarily occupies the capture binding domain. This intermediary prevents direct interaction between the capture binding domain and capture probes during storage and preparation, reducing background noise. The blocking probe is then removed to allow specific analyte binding

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If the capture binding domain is blocked to reduce background noise, then the specificity improves, but the binding efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovespecificityVSAvoidbinding efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The blocking probe is periodically applied and removed in a controlled manner. The blocking probe is applied before the assay to establish high specificity, then removed at the appropriate time to enable efficient analyte binding. This periodic action allows the system to switch between high specificity mode and high efficiency mode as needed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Measurement precision

If a second capture step is added to enhance specificity, then the measurement precision improves, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovespecificityVSAvoidworkflow complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The blocking probe application step is merged with the sample preparation phase, and the removal of the blocking probe is combined with the initiation of the analyte binding assay. This merging of steps reduces the overall workflow complexity while maintaining the enhanced specificity provided by the second capture step

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach significantly increases the specificity of analyte binding, reducing background noise and improving the resolution of spatial analysis by ensuring that analytes bind specifically to their target locations, thereby enhancing the accuracy of analyte localization and abundance determination in biological samples.

Implementation Method 1

a capture binding domain that hybridizes to the capture domain of the capture probe

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectNucleic acid hybridization:

Implementation Method 2

wherein a portion of the capture binding domain is blocked

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectNucleic acid hybridization:

Data Source

PatentUS20230323453A1Enhancing specificity of analyte binding
Publication Date: 2023.10.12 10X GENOMICS INC
  • US20230323453A1 patent drawing
  • US20230323453A1 patent drawing
  • US20230323453A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods for enhancing specificity of an analyte binding moiety or probe oligonucleotide to an analyte are provided herein. For example, methods provided herein include blocking a capture binding domain, thereby preventing hybridization to the capture domain of the capture probe affixed to a substrate. Further methods include releasing the block from the capture binding domain, thereby allowing the capture binding domain to specifically bind to the capture domain of the capture probe on the substrate.