Blood Processing System Error Detection and Correction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing blood processing systems lack effective monitoring and correction mechanisms for defects in disposable fluid flow circuits and installation errors, which can lead to improper system functioning and safety issues.

Innovation Solution

A durable blood processing system with a graphical user interface and controller that detects errors in the fluid flow circuit association and defects, displaying interactive icons to guide the operator in moving clamps from a closed to an open condition to allow fluid flow, thereby enabling correction of installation errors and preventing unsafe conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a traditional alarm system is used to detect installation errors, then error detection capability is provided, but the system complexity increases and operator burden increases due to non-intuitive alerts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror detection capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors tubing installation status and provides real-time visual feedback through color-coded indicators and icons. Sensors detect whether tubing is properly connected and display this information intuitively on the graphical user interface, allowing operators to immediately understand system status without interpreting complex alarm codes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The graphical user interface acts as an intermediary between the complex sensor network and the operator. It translates raw sensor data into intuitive visual representations including color-coded icons, animated sequences, and step-by-step guidance, simplifying the interaction between the operator and the complex monitoring system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If traditional alarm systems are used, then error detection is possible, but ease of operation deteriorates due to non-intuitive alerts and lack of guidance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror detectionVSAvoidoperator ease of use
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides immediate visual feedback about installation status through color-coded indicators (green for correct, red for incorrect). When errors are detected, the system displays animated sequences and icons that guide operators through correction steps, making the system intuitive and easy to operate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically guides operators through error correction procedures without requiring external assistance. The graphical user interface displays step-by-step instructions and monitors correction progress, enabling operators to independently resolve installation errors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If real-time monitoring is implemented, then safety is improved by detecting errors immediately, but device complexity increases due to additional sensors and control mechanisms

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidsensor and control complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The graphical user interface serves multiple functions: it displays system status, provides error detection, guides correction procedures, and confirms proper installation. This multi-functional approach consolidates what would otherwise require separate systems into a single integrated interface, reducing overall complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

Sensors provide continuous feedback about tubing installation status, and the system automatically responds by displaying appropriate visual indicators and guidance. This closed-loop feedback mechanism enables real-time safety monitoring while maintaining simplicity through automated responses rather than complex control logic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Ease of repair

If automated error correction guidance is provided, then ease of repair is improved, but device complexity increases due to interactive interface requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror correction easeVSAvoidinterface complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of repairVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system monitors correction actions in real-time and provides feedback through visual indicators that change as corrections are made. Animated sequences and icons guide operators through each correction step, and the system confirms when errors have been resolved, making repair intuitive despite the sophisticated interface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The graphical user interface mediates between the complex error correction processes and the operator. It translates sensor data and system state into simple visual instructions, and translates operator actions into system commands, simplifying the repair process while managing interface complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS10254916B2Systems and methods for monitoring and correcting defects and tubing installation errors for blood processing systems
Publication Date: 2019.04.09 FENWAL INC
  • US10254916B2 patent drawing
  • US10254916B2 patent drawing
  • US10254916B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system is provided for processing blood from a blood source. The system cooperates with a disposable fluid flow circuit including a tubing line that is associated with a clamp of the system. The system also includes a sensor and a controller, which cooperate to determine whether the fluid flow circuit and/or the system itself is defective and/or if the fluid flow circuit has been installed onto the system improperly. If such an error or defect exists, then the controller determines whether a selected system state exists. The controller causes a change in the appearance of the display of the system, which includes displaying an interactive icon if the selected system state exists. The icon, when manipulated, causes the clamp to move from the closed condition to an open condition.