Blood Pump Control System Optimizing Flow via Speed Interventions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing blood pump control systems struggle to automatically and reliably maintain sufficient blood flow, especially during long-term extracorporeal circulation, as they fail to detect and prevent venous return flow collapse and arterial flow disruptions, posing life-threatening risks.

Innovation Solution

A method that uses periodic pump speed interventions and differential flow speed ratio (DFSR) calculations to detect and correct venous and arterial flow issues, allowing for rapid stabilization and optimization of blood flow, even in non-pulsatile conditions like cardiac arrest, by adjusting pump speed and measuring flow changes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual monitoring and correction of blood flow parameters is performed, then blood flow can be optimized, but it becomes impossible to maintain reliable blood flow during long-term extracorporeal circulation without staff-intensive monitoring

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveblood flow reliabilityVSAvoidautomation level
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The control system continuously monitors blood flow parameters (flow rate, pressure gradients, pump speed) and automatically adjusts pump operations based on detected deviations. The system provides feedback loops that detect collapse tendencies and trigger corrective actions without manual intervention, enabling reliable long-term operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The blood pump system performs self-monitoring and self-correction of operational parameters. The control algorithm automatically identifies flow disruptions, determines appropriate corrective measures, and executes them independently, reducing the need for continuous staff monitoring while maintaining blood flow reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Productivity

If pump speed is continuously increased to maintain sufficient blood flow, then blood flow is optimized, but venous vessels and atrium may collapse due to excessive drainage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveblood flow rateVSAvoidvessel collapse
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The pump speed is dynamically adjusted based on real-time monitoring of blood flow parameters and vessel status. The system continuously adapts the pump operation to match actual hemodynamic conditions, increasing speed when needed to maintain flow while decreasing it to prevent vessel collapse, rather than operating at a fixed high speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The control system monitors blood flow rate, pressure gradients, and pump performance parameters to detect signs of vessel collapse or excessive drainage. When deviations are detected, the system automatically reduces pump speed or adjusts operation to prevent harmful effects while maintaining adequate blood flow.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Object-affected harmful factors

If pump speed is reduced to prevent vessel collapse, then vessel damage is avoided, but sufficient blood flow cannot be maintained

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevessel collapse preventionVSAvoidblood flow rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The pump operates with dynamically adjusted speed based on continuous monitoring of hemodynamic parameters. The system identifies the optimal operating point that maintains sufficient blood flow while preventing vessel collapse, adjusting speed up or down as conditions change rather than maintaining a fixed speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The control system continuously monitors blood flow parameters and vessel status to detect the optimal operating range. When flow is sufficient and vessels are stable, the system maintains appropriate speed; when signs of collapse appear, it reduces speed; when flow becomes insufficient, it increases speed, creating a self-regulating system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Stability of the object's composition

If periodic pump speed interventions are implemented to optimize blood flow, then flow stability is improved, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveblood flow stabilityVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system uses feedback from monitored blood flow parameters to automatically trigger periodic speed interventions. The algorithm analyzes flow stability and pump performance, identifying optimal moments for speed adjustment to enhance stability without requiring complex manual control protocols.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-optimization by automatically detecting flow conditions and executing appropriate speed interventions based on pre-programmed control algorithms. This self-service capability reduces the need for complex external control mechanisms while maintaining blood flow stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS9259521B2Method and apparatus for monitoring and optimizing blood circulation generated by a pump
Publication Date: 2016.02.16 MAQUET CARDIOPULMONARY GMBH
  • US9259521B2 patent drawing
  • US9259521B2 patent drawing
  • US9259521B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In a device for the automatic control of blood pumps, an optimization of the blood flow is achieved by periodic speed interventions and flow changes thereby occurring, using a formed differential variable and a control algorithm. In addition, the location of possible flow resistances on the venous or arterial side can be ascertained.