Blood Component Separation Control With Pre-Process Evaluation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing biological fluid processing systems rely on empirical assumptions that may not accurately reflect the conditions of the actual processing, leading to potential inefficiencies and unsafe operations due to lack of precise data and operator experience.

Innovation Solution

A blood processing system with reusable hardware and disposable fluid circuits, equipped with a controller that performs pre-process calculations and checks, providing real-time feedback and warnings to ensure accurate volume collection and safe operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If pre-process calculations and real-time monitoring are implemented, then processing accuracy and safety are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevolume collection accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs pre-process calculations before the actual separation process to determine expected volumes, times, and conditions. This allows the system to prepare monitoring parameters and safety thresholds in advance, improving accuracy without adding real-time computational complexity during the actual process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors actual process parameters (volume, time, pressure) and compares them against pre-calculated expectations and preset ranges. When deviations are detected, the system provides feedback to the operator through warnings and alerts, enabling corrective action while maintaining automated monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If multiple sensors and monitoring systems are added, then operational safety is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational safetyVSAvoidnumber of components
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control unit serves multiple functions: it controls the separation process, monitors sensor data, performs pre-process calculations, stores process parameters, and interfaces with the operator. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate dedicated components for each function, improving safety without proportionally increasing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically monitors itself through integrated sensors that track process parameters without requiring external monitoring equipment. The control unit self-diagnoses and provides warnings when parameters deviate from expected ranges, enabling the system to monitor its own safety without additional complex external systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Manufacturing precision

If real-time monitoring and warnings are implemented, then process control is improved, but loss of time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess control accuracyVSAvoidprocess interruption time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides real-time feedback through warnings and alerts when process parameters approach unsafe ranges or deviate from expected values. This allows the operator to take corrective action proactively, preventing process failures and interruptions before they occur, thereby maintaining precision while minimizing actual process downtime.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Ensures uniform and safe processing by preventing damage to materials and producing products that meet specifications, while alerting operators to deviations during operation.

Implementation Method 1

Separation devices may separate the biological fluid based on centrifugal separation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCentrifugal separation: Centrifugal Separation

Implementation Method 2

Separation devices may separate the biological fluid based on centrifugal separation and/or, as described below, membrane separation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMembrane separation: Semipermeable Membrane

Implementation Method 3

a weight scale configured to weigh the product container

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravitation: Gravitation

Implementation Method 4

check the air detector sensor for a fluid/air interface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSurface tension: Surface Tension

Data Source

PatentUS20250375557A1Cell Processing System And Method With Preliminary Process Evaluation
Publication Date: 2025.12.11 FENWAL INC
  • US20250375557A1 patent drawing
  • US20250375557A1 patent drawing
  • US20250375557A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A cell processing system includes a processor connectable to a source container filled with a biological fluid, the processor including a separator configured to separate the biological fluid from the source container into at least two streams according to a process including at least one process parameter, and a controller coupled to the processor and an input. The controller is configured to receive the at least one process parameter, to evaluate the process using the at least one process parameter before performing the process, and to carry out one or more actions based on the evaluation, such as providing an output estimate to the operator, preventing the process from being performed according to a comparison between a calculated condition and a control, or providing an error indication to the operator according to the calculated condition and a measured in-process condition.