Blow Molding Split Mold Sliding Mechanism to Prevent Gnawing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing blow molding mechanisms face issues with scratching or gnawing at the boundary portions between split molds due to high contact pressure and sliding, leading to potential defects in the final product and reduced machinability of the molds.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a sliding member with higher hardness than the adjacent split molds, which is attachable and detachable, allows for sliding without contact, reducing the risk of scratching or gnawing and improving machinability by allowing the molds to open and close in a perpendicular direction.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If split molds are used in blow molding, then the mold can be opened and closed in a perpendicular direction to the injection direction, but scratching or gnawing occurs at the boundary portions between split molds due to high contact pressure and sliding

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemold opening and closing directionVSAvoidscratching or gnawing at boundary portions
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

A sliding member is introduced as an intermediary component between the first and second split molds. This sliding member enables relative sliding motion between the split molds while preventing direct contact between them, thereby eliminating scratching and gnawing at the boundary portions. The sliding member acts as a mediator that allows the perpendicular opening/closing operation while protecting the mold boundaries from damage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of manufacture

If the first and second split molds are made of the same material, then manufacturing is simplified, but the boundary portions are prone to scratching and gnawing due to equal hardness

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial uniformityVSAvoidresistance to scratching and gnawing
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of using uniform material throughout, the invention applies different material properties to different components. The sliding member is made of a material with higher hardness than the split molds, creating a local quality enhancement at the critical boundary interface. This localized hardness improvement protects the boundary portions from scratching and gnawing while maintaining overall manufacturing feasibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Object-affected harmful factors

If the sliding member is made of a material with higher hardness than the split molds, then scratching and gnawing are prevented, but the sliding member wears faster

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescratching and gnawing preventionVSAvoidsliding member service life
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDuration of action of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The sliding member is designed as a replaceable component with a planned service life. By making the sliding member detachable and designed to wear, the system allows for easy replacement of the sliding member rather than the entire mold. This approach accepts that the sliding member will wear faster but minimizes the impact through easy replacement, while the expensive split molds retain their higher hardness and longevity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

4Reliability

If the first and second split molds are made of different materials with different hardness, then scratching and gnawing are reduced, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresistance to scratching and gnawingVSAvoidmaterial selection and processing
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of making the entire split mold system from different materials, the invention applies different material properties locally only to the sliding member. The split molds can be manufactured from standard materials, while the sliding member uses a harder material specifically at the interface where scratching and gnawing occur. This localized approach reduces overall manufacturing complexity compared to using different materials for all components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS20250214296A1Operation mechanism, blow molding mechanism, split mold, and mold unit
Publication Date: 2025.07.03 SUMITOMO HEAVY IND LTD
  • US20250214296A1 patent drawing
  • US20250214296A1 patent drawing
  • US20250214296A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An operation mechanism includes: a first member that is a member which operates in a second direction perpendicular to a first direction in which a stationary mold and a movable mold are closed and opened; a second member that is a member which operates in the second direction and that does not come into contact with the first member; and a sliding member that is attachably and detachably fixed to the second member and that is slidable with respect to the first member.