Blower Motor Braking Current Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Blower apparatuses with electric drive motors experience overrun times of 3 to 5 seconds after shutdown, resulting in a persisting blower air flow that is disruptive when handling lightweight materials like leaves, as the rotational inertia of the blower wheel and motor cause continued air flow despite motor shutdown.

Innovation Solution

The blower apparatus incorporates a control unit that applies a braking current to the drive motor, controlling its rotational speed to achieve a characteristic curve with an even negative slope, effectively reducing the blower air flow to a non-effective residual volume quickly, allowing the user to turn the air flow on or off as needed, and limiting perceived torque during deceleration.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If the blower wheel is mounted with minimal friction to reduce drive losses, then energy efficiency is improved, but the overrun time increases to 3-5 seconds causing disruptive residual air flow

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedrive lossesVSAvoidoverrun time
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDuration of action of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The control unit applies a braking current to the drive motor before the natural overrun period would complete, creating a counteracting force that actively opposes the rotational momentum. This preliminary anti-action reduces the overrun time from 3-5 seconds to under 1 second, eliminating disruptive residual air flow while maintaining the low-friction mounting for energy efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

2Duration of action of moving object

If a braking current is applied to reduce overrun time, then the residual air flow is reduced quickly, but additional control complexity is introduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoverrun timeVSAvoidcontrol unit complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control unit performs multiple functions: it controls the drive motor during normal operation, applies braking current during shutdown, and manages the field windings through short-circuiting. By integrating these diverse functions into a single control unit, the patent minimizes additional complexity while achieving rapid overrun reduction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The control unit dynamically changes the electrical parameters of the drive motor by switching between drive current and braking current modes. It also adjusts the field winding configuration through short-circuiting at different stages. These parameter changes enable rapid deceleration without requiring complex mechanical braking mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Speed

If the field windings are short-circuited to achieve quick standstill, then the braking effectiveness is improved, but high current peaks may occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeceleration rateVSAvoidcurrent peak
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The control unit short-circuits the field windings at the appropriate moment during the braking process, before the rotor comes to complete rest. This preliminary action ensures that the electromagnetic braking force is applied when most needed, maximizing deceleration effectiveness while controlling current peaks through proper timing and resistance management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution enables a rapid cessation of the blower air flow, reducing disruption during use and ensuring the air flow is fully shut off before it becomes ineffective, with the braking current also being used to charge the battery and manage torque, enhancing user control and operational efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

the control unit supports the deceleration of the drive motor via a braking current (I) in order to reduce the blower air flow

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

Because of the minimal friction and the inertia of the blower wheel and the masses rotating with the blower wheel such as the rotor of the drive motor, overrun times of 3 to 5 seconds occur despite a switching off of the motor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInertia: Inertia

Data Source

PatentUS8742703B2Blower apparatus having an electric drive motor
Publication Date: 2014.06.03 YOUNG FAST OPTOELECTRONICS
  • US8742703B2 patent drawing
  • US8742703B2 patent drawing
  • US8742703B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a blower apparatus (1) having a blower wheel (4) for generating a blower air flow (50). The blower wheel (4) is arranged in a housing (2), wherein the blower wheel is driven by an electric drive motor (8). A blower tube (6) via which the generated blower air flow (50) is guided connects at an outlet (5). A control unit (17) is provided for controlling the rotational speed of the electric drive motor. For a quick reduction of the blower air flow (50), it is provided that the control unit (17) supports the deceleration of the drive motor (8) through a braking current (I).