Blower Controller Torque Prediction Using Composite Function

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for converting air flow demands into torque demands in blower systems suffer from significant prediction errors due to their inability to accurately account for non-linear relationships between air flow, speed, and torque.

Innovation Solution

Incorporating a composite function S*(FFD)^n into the torque equation, where S is the motor speed, FFD is the fluid flow demand, and n>1, to improve the accuracy of torque demand conversion.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional linear or multiple slope algorithms are used to convert air flow demand into torque demand, then the control scheme is simple and easy to implement, but the prediction error increases significantly due to inability to account for non-linear relationships

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetorque demand prediction accuracyVSAvoidcontrol equation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the control approach by changing the mathematical parameters from simple linear or piecewise linear relationships to a composite function that incorporates non-linear terms. Specifically, the torque demand equation includes terms like S*CFM^n where S is motor speed, CFM is air flow demand, and n>1, allowing the system to capture non-linear relationships between airflow and torque while maintaining a manageable equation structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The control equation acts as a composite mathematical model combining multiple terms with different functional relationships (linear terms, quadratic terms, cross-products of speed and airflow). This composite approach allows the system to model complex non-linear behavior by combining simpler mathematical building blocks, achieving high prediction accuracy without requiring an overly complex control scheme.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Reliability

If complex non-linear models are used to accurately convert air flow demand into torque demand, then prediction accuracy improves, but the control scheme becomes more complex and difficult to implement

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveair flow demand to torque demand conversion accuracyVSAvoidcontroller implementation difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent achieves reliable torque prediction by carefully selecting and combining specific parameters in the control equation. The use of motor speed S, air flow demand CFM, and their product with appropriate exponents creates a model that accurately reflects the physical relationships in the system while remaining computationally tractable for real-time control implementation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The control equation applies different mathematical relationships to different operating conditions through its multiple terms. Each term in the composite function captures specific local behavior characteristics, allowing the overall equation to provide accurate predictions across the full range of operating conditions without requiring a completely different model for each regime.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS7567049B2Fluid flow control for fluid handling systems
Publication Date: 2009.07.28 NIDEC MOTOR CORP
  • US7567049B2 patent drawing
  • US7567049B2 patent drawing
  • US7567049B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A controller for an electric motor in a blower system includes an input for receiving an air flow demand. The controller is configured for producing drive signals for the electric motor from the air flow demand using an equation having a plurality of terms. At least one of the terms includes a composite function S*CFMn, where S is a speed of the electric motor, CFM is the air flow demand, and n>1. These teachings can also be applied to other types of fluid handling systems including, for example, liquid pumps.