Blowing Mould Halves Vertical Extraction Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing methods for manufacturing plastic containers through blow moulding require a significant distance for opening the mould halves, leading to increased cycle time, mechanical inertia, and reduced component lifespan due to excessive friction.

Innovation Solution

The mould halves are moved apart by a smaller distance, adjusted based on the transverse dimensions of the container, allowing for efficient removal of the blown container from underneath the mould, reducing friction and mechanical stress on components.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If the mould halves are moved apart over a large distance to enable lateral removal of the container, then the container can be successfully removed from the mould, but the cycle time increases and mechanical components suffer from excessive friction and inertia

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontainer removalVSAvoidcycle time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent inverts the conventional removal approach by changing from lateral removal to vertical removal. Instead of opening the mould halves laterally over a large distance, the mould is opened vertically with a small horizontal displacement, allowing the container to be removed from underneath the mould. This inversion resolves the contradiction by enabling successful container removal while significantly reducing the travel distance of mould halves, thereby reducing cycle time and mechanical wear.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

2Ease of operation

If the mould halves are moved apart over a large distance, then the container can be removed laterally, but mechanical inertia and friction increase, reducing component lifespan

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontainer removalVSAvoidcomponent lifespan
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies inversion by changing the removal direction from lateral to vertical. The mould halves are moved apart over a small horizontal distance rather than a large lateral distance, which significantly reduces friction and mechanical inertia. This reduced mechanical stress directly improves the reliability and lifespan of moving components while still enabling successful container removal from underneath the mould.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

3Reliability

If the overall distance for opening mould halves is reduced, then friction and mechanical stress decrease, but the container removal becomes more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent lifespanVSAvoidcontainer removal
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dimensionality change by transitioning from lateral removal to vertical removal. Instead of requiring large horizontal displacement to remove the container, the mould is opened vertically with minimal horizontal movement. This dimensional shift allows for reduced friction and mechanical stress on components while maintaining effective container removal capability through the vertical opening motion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Reliability

If the mould is opened with a smaller displacement, then mechanical wear is reduced, but the cycle time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent lifespanVSAvoidcycle time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent resolves this contradiction through inversion of the removal mechanism. By changing from lateral to vertical removal, the mould halves move apart over a small distance, reducing mechanical wear and extending component lifespan. The vertical opening mechanism enables this reduced displacement while maintaining efficient container removal, thereby not significantly impacting productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces cycle time, extends the lifespan of mechanical components, and facilitates easier handling and transfer of filled containers by allowing extraction from underneath the mould, thereby improving manufacturing efficiency and reducing maintenance needs.

Implementation Method 1

The preform is then blown or stretch-blown along its longitudinal axis and radially so as to deform and come into contact with the inner walls of the mould

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGas inflation: Pressure Increase

Implementation Method 2

injecting a liquid into the preform so as to cause expansion of said preform within the blowing mould while the preform is being stretched

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLiquid injection: Pressure Increase

Data Source

PatentUS10479015B2Method and an apparatus for blowing a container in a blowing mould
Publication Date: 2019.11.19 SOCIETE DES PRODUITS NESTLE SA
  • US10479015B2 patent drawing
  • US10479015B2 patent drawing
  • US10479015B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention concerns a method of manufacturing a container in a blowing mould, the blown container having a neck and a bottom aligned along a longitudinal axis and being enclosed within a blowing mould, the blowing mould comprising two side halves which are in contact with each other along a joint plane when the blowing mould is in a closed position, the blown container having at least one transverse dimension in a longitudinal cross-section including the longitudinal axis, characterized in that the method comprises a step of moving apart the two side halves of the blowing mould along a substantially transverse direction, the two side halves being moved apart from the joint plane over an overall distance that is less than the greatest transverse dimension of the blown container and that enables extraction of the blown container from the blowing mould.