Frequency Hopping Carrier Allocation for Bluetooth Interference

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Bluetooth frequency hopping systems face challenges in achieving high user density due to interference limitations, where increasing transmit power affects the Signal-to-Interference-plus-Noise ratio (SINR) for all users, especially in scenarios where some users move from interference-limited to noise-limited conditions, impacting overall system performance.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a method to dynamically allocate a subset of carriers to a long-range carrier class and a short-range carrier class within the frequency-hopping spectrum, where high transmit power users utilize the long-range carriers, and low transmit power users use the short-range carriers, with a central controller managing the allocation based on activity levels and power thresholds to optimize carrier selection and minimize interference.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Power

If all transmitters increase their transmit power levels to improve SINR, then the desired signal strength increases, but the interference level increases proportionally, leaving the SINR ratio unchanged

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransmit power levelVSAvoidinterference level
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The frequency spectrum is divided into multiple carrier classes (first carrier class, second carrier class, third carrier class) with different power levels. Each class is allocated to specific users based on their distance from base stations and power requirements, allowing differentiated power management across the system rather than uniform power adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different power levels are assigned to different carrier classes based on local requirements. Users closer to base stations use lower power carriers while distant users use higher power carriers, creating localized quality optimization rather than system-wide uniform treatment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If a rogue user moves away from their desk and increases transmit power to maintain connection quality, then their personal SINR improves, but the SINR of other users is affected negatively

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconnection qualityVSAvoidinterference to other users
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments users into different classes based on their power requirements and distance from base stations. Rogue users who move away are automatically classified and assigned to appropriate carrier classes, preventing their power increase from negatively impacting nearby users.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts carrier class assignments based on real-time power level monitoring. When a user's power requirements change due to movement, the system adapts the carrier class allocation accordingly, maintaining optimal performance for all users.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Adaptability or versatility

If the system uses a single uniform carrier allocation for all users, then the device complexity is low, but the adaptability to different user positions and power requirements is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to user positionsVSAvoidcarrier allocation management
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The carrier spectrum is segmented into multiple classes with different power characteristics. This segmentation enables the system to adapt to different user positions and power requirements by assigning appropriate carrier classes, while the segmentation itself provides a structured framework that manages complexity through organization rather than requiring complex dynamic allocation algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS11469792B2Long-range frequency hopping spectrum
Publication Date: 2022.10.11 HEWLETT PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LP
  • US11469792B2 patent drawing
  • US11469792B2 patent drawing
  • US11469792B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and apparatuses for carrier selection are described. In one example, a method of carrier selection for a frequency-hopping wireless communication device includes using a fixed set of available carriers to hop over during communications. The method includes allocating a subset of the available carriers to a long-range carrier class. In one example, the subset of available carriers consists of at least two carrier clusters spaced widely in the frequency spectrum. The method further includes monitoring a transmit power level in the wireless communication device. The method further includes using the long-range carrier class to hop over during communications if the wireless communication device transmit power is greater than a predetermined level.