Bluetooth Frequency Class Selection for Wi-Fi Interference

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Bluetooth devices face interference from Wi-Fi devices in shared frequency bands, leading to reduced communication quality and throughput, and existing Adaptive Frequency Hopping (AFH) methods are time-consuming, causing potential communication interruptions.

Innovation Solution

A method to quickly choose working Bluetooth frequency points by dividing Bluetooth frequencies into classes based on their relationship with non-overlapping Wi-Fi channels, determining qualified frequency groups, and saving these frequencies into a channel map table for efficient AFH operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional AFH methods are used to select Bluetooth frequency points, then interference from Wi-Fi devices can be reduced, but the selection process is time-consuming and causes communication interruptions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanti-interference capabilityVSAvoidfrequency selection time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent pre-divides the Bluetooth frequency spectrum into multiple frequency classes based on their relationship with Wi-Fi channels before actual communication occurs. This preliminary classification creates a structured framework that enables rapid frequency selection during operation, eliminating the need for time-consuming real-time analysis while maintaining anti-interference capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the Bluetooth frequency range into distinct frequency classes (first through fourth classes) based on their overlap relationships with Wi-Fi channels. This segmentation allows the system to quickly identify suitable frequency groups without examining individual frequencies, significantly reducing selection time while preserving interference avoidance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Adaptability or versatility

If Bluetooth devices operate in shared 2.4 GHz frequency band with Wi-Fi devices, then wireless communication coverage is maintained, but communication quality and throughput are reduced due to interference

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefrequency band compatibilityVSAvoidcommunication throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different quality characteristics to different frequency classes based on their interference levels. Frequency classes with less Wi-Fi overlap are designated as more suitable for communication, while those with significant overlap are avoided. This local differentiation allows the system to maintain operation in the shared 2.4 GHz band while optimizing throughput by selecting only the high-quality frequency segments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Measurement precision

If all Bluetooth frequencies are individually evaluated for interference, then accurate frequency selection is achieved, but the complexity and time required for frequency selection increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefrequency evaluation accuracyVSAvoidfrequency selection process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the frequency evaluation process into hierarchical segments: first dividing Bluetooth frequencies into classes based on Wi-Fi channel relationships, then evaluating frequency groups rather than individual frequencies. This segmentation maintains measurement precision at the group level while dramatically reducing computational complexity compared to individual frequency evaluation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent evaluates a representative sample of frequencies within each frequency group rather than every individual frequency. By detecting a predetermined number of qualified or unqualified frequencies in each group, the system achieves sufficient accuracy for practical purposes while avoiding the excessive complexity of complete enumeration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS12022299B2Apparatus and method of choosing working frequency points
Publication Date: 2024.06.25 BEKEN CORP
  • US12022299B2 patent drawing
  • US12022299B2 patent drawing
  • US12022299B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A Bluetooth receiver includes a memory; and one or more processors in communication with the memory, the one or more processors configured to perform operations including: dividing Bluetooth frequencies of the Bluetooth receiver into Bluetooth frequency classes based on a frequency relationship among Bluetooth channels of the Bluetooth receiver and non-overlapping Wi-Fi channels of an interfering Wi-Fi device operating in a Wi-Fi frequency range within the Bluetooth frequency range, each Bluetooth frequency class including one or more Bluetooth frequency groups; determining one or more working Bluetooth frequency groups of the Bluetooth frequency classes based on pre-determined requirements, and saving entire working Bluetooth frequencies within the one or more working Bluetooth frequency groups into a channel map table, which can be used for Adaptive Frequency Hopping (AFH) to reduce Wi-Fi interferences caused by the Wi-Fi device. The Bluetooth receiver may efficiently and quickly choose working Bluetooth frequency points.