Blunt Cutting Tooth Geometry for Packaging Closure Stability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing cutting devices with thermoplastic cutting teeth suffer from unstable, tapered tooth tips that lead to weak perforation and ragged cutting lines, especially when opening containers with plastic, laminated, or metal layers, resulting in inefficient and uneven cutting.

Innovation Solution

Designing cutting teeth with a blunt, radially defined tooth tip and a cutting edge perpendicular to the axis of rotation, which provides a stable and smooth cutting action by notching rather than perforating, and using an injection molding process with a parting plane that ensures a robust tooth tip without edges or flashes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If the tooth tip is designed with a maximally tapering geometry to achieve flexibility and perforation capability, then the tooth tip becomes weak and unstable, but this leads to insufficient perforating effect and bending of the tooth

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperforation capabilityVSAvoidtooth tip stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the geometric parameters of the tooth tip by defining a blunt tip with a minimum radius instead of a maximally tapering geometry. This parameter change maintains structural stability while preserving sufficient perforation capability through the controlled bluntness of the tip.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies beforehand cushioning by designing a robust tooth tip geometry that anticipates and prevents the instability and bending issues that occur with overly tapered tips. The blunter geometry serves as a preventive measure against tooth deformation during the cutting process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

2Ease of manufacture

If the parting line is disposed directly at the thinnest point of the tooth tip to facilitate mold parting, then manufacturing is simplified, but this creates a weakened tooth tip with injection molding edges that reduce cutting performance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemold parting simplicityVSAvoidtooth tip geometry precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the problematic parting line from the tooth tip region by positioning it away from the thinnest point of the tooth. This separation removes the source of injection molding edges and flashes from the critical tooth tip geometry, preserving manufacturing precision while maintaining ease of manufacture through the simplified blunt tip design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Device complexity

If injection molding is used to produce the cutting device as one piece with the closure device, then assembly is simplified, but this causes internal pressure to stress the parting plane and create injection molding edges on the tooth tip

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassembly complexityVSAvoidinjection molding edges
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the harmful injection molding edges from the tooth tip region by repositioning the parting line away from the thinnest point of the tooth. This eliminates the source of the harmful factors while maintaining the beneficial one-piece injection molding construction that simplifies assembly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Adaptability or versatility

If a maximally tapering tooth tip geometry is used to achieve flexibility, then the tooth can adapt to container covering, but this results in a weak tooth tip that does not have sufficient tightness and perforating effect

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to container coveringVSAvoidtooth tip strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the geometric parameters of the tooth tip by specifying a blunt tip with a minimum radius rather than a maximally tapering geometry. This parameter change increases tooth tip strength while maintaining adaptability to container covering through the controlled bluntness that allows sufficient flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10392157B2Cutting tooth of a rotatable cutting device of a packaging closure
Publication Date: 2019.08.27 SYNTEGON POUCH SYST AG
  • US10392157B2 patent drawing
  • US10392157B2 patent drawing
  • US10392157B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A cutting tooth (101) of a cutting device is disclosed as part of a closure device for opening a container covering for the first time. The shape of the cutting tooth (101) with a blunted tooth tip (1011) with a cutting edge (1012) leads to improved cutting results, wherein the container covering is notched or nicked. Here, each cutting tooth (101) has a robust tooth tip (1011) without edges which cuts into the container covering as a result of rotation of a cap of the closure device, wherein the cutting device is moved along with it.