Image Blur Correction Coil Magnet Stacking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing image blur correcting devices face challenges in design freedom and miniaturization due to the increased weight of movable members, which requires thicker driving coils and magnets, leading to protrusions that can interfere with guide shafts and reduce design flexibility.

Innovation Solution

The image blur correcting device employs a configuration where the driving coils and magnets are positioned to protrude from the movable members in a way that maximizes propulsive force while minimizing interference, allowing for reduced thickness and weight, and improved center of gravity alignment to prevent resonance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If the size of the imaging element or the imaging optical system is increased, then the imaging performance is improved, but the weight of the movable member is increased

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimaging performanceVSAvoidweight of movable member
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent positions driving coils and magnets on opposite sides of the movable member in the optical axis direction, utilizing the third dimension (depth) to distribute driving components. This dimensional arrangement allows the propulsive force generation elements to be separated spatially, reducing their horizontal footprint and preventing interference with guide shafts while maintaining the required propulsive force for the heavier movable member.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Force

If the thickness of the driving coil and the driving magnet is increased to secure propulsive force, then the propulsive force is improved, but the device complexity is increased due to protrusions interfering with guide shafts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepropulsive forceVSAvoiddesign freedom
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent resolves the interference issue by arranging driving coils and magnets on opposite sides of the movable member along the optical axis. This vertical stacking in the third dimension eliminates horizontal interference with guide shafts while preserving the necessary thickness and propulsive force of each driving component, thereby maintaining design freedom.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs asymmetric positioning of driving components relative to the movable member, with driving coils and magnets placed on opposite sides rather than symmetrically adjacent to a single guide shaft. This asymmetric arrangement naturally avoids interference with the guide shaft structure while distributing mechanical stress and magnetic fields more effectively.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

3Force

If the distance between the driving coil and the driving magnet is reduced to increase propulsive force, then the propulsive force is improved, but interference with guide shafts occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepropulsive forceVSAvoidinterference
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent eliminates interference by transitioning the arrangement from a horizontal layout (adjacent to guide shafts) to a vertical layout (opposite sides of the movable member along the optical axis). This dimensional change allows the driving coil and magnet to be positioned close to each other for maximum propulsive force while the guide shaft passes through the movable member without obstruction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration enhances design freedom, enables miniaturization, and reduces weight, allowing for effective image blur correction without interference issues.

Implementation Method 1

a driving coil or a driving magnet that is fixed to at least one of the two movable members and generates a propulsive force for moving the two movable members

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic force: Lorentz Force

Data Source

PatentUS11830169B2Image blur correcting device, lens device, and imaging device
Publication Date: 2023.11.28 FUJIFILM CORP
  • US11830169B2 patent drawing
  • US11830169B2 patent drawing
  • US11830169B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided are an image blur correcting device that capable of improving a degree of freedom in design and realizing miniaturization or weight reduction, a lens device including the image blur correcting device, and an imaging device including the lens device. An image blur correcting device includes a fixing member, a first movable member that is supported by the fixing member in a state of being movable in a direction X, and a second movable member that is supported by the first movable member in a state of being movable in a direction Y A second coil that drives the second movable member is fixed to one first surface of the second movable member in a direction Z, and a first coil that drives the first movable member is fixed to the other second surface of the second movable member in the direction Z.