BMS Vulnerability Prediction for IoT Device Security Mapping

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Building Management Systems (BMS) are vulnerable to cyberattacks due to the integration of IoT-enabled devices, which are difficult to detect and manage, especially when IT and OT components are not clearly mapped, leading to potential attacks that go unnoticed.

Innovation Solution

A system and method utilizing a communication module and processing circuit to establish communication links with IoT-enabled devices, remote data sources, and remote controllers, analyzing data for vulnerability detection and prediction by generating signals with location coordinates, and employing artificial intelligence for proactive threat assessment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If IoT-enabled devices are integrated into BMS to improve intelligent ability and modernization, then processing capabilities and automation are enhanced, but vulnerability to cyberattacks increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing capabilitiesVSAvoidcyberattack vulnerability
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs vulnerability assessments and security analyses before actual cyberattacks can occur. By continuously monitoring and evaluating the security posture of IoT devices in advance, the system enables proactive security measures to be implemented, preventing attacks rather than merely responding to them after occurrence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system establishes continuous feedback loops by monitoring security metrics, vulnerability indicators, and system behaviors of IoT devices. This feedback mechanism allows the BMS to dynamically adjust security configurations, update threat models, and respond to emerging vulnerabilities in real-time, maintaining security posture as the system evolves.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Ease of operation

If BMS devices are installed at locations difficult to access physically, then operational functionality is maintained, but vulnerability detection and prevention become impossible

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational functionalityVSAvoidvulnerability detection
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces physical access requirements with remote digital monitoring capabilities. Instead of requiring physical presence at difficult-to-access device locations for security assessments, the system uses network-based communication, telemetry data, and remote sensing to evaluate vulnerabilities, substituting mechanical/physical inspection methods with electronic monitoring systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces intermediary components such as remote sensors, communication modules, and data aggregation platforms that bridge the gap between physically inaccessible BMS devices and security analysts. These intermediaries enable indirect observation and assessment of device security states without requiring direct physical access to the devices themselves.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Device complexity

If IT infrastructure and OT components are not clearly mapped, then system simplicity is maintained, but attack detection fails as attacks go unnoticed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem mapping complexityVSAvoidattack detection capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the BMS into distinct IT and OT components with clear functional boundaries and relationships. By creating a structured breakdown of system elements, communication interfaces, and data flows, the system generates an explicit mapping that identifies security boundaries, attack vectors, and detection points without overwhelming complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system adds a new dimension of security mapping by creating visual or structured representations of IT-OT intersections that are separate from the operational hierarchy. This dimensional addition provides security analysts with a specialized view of system architecture focused on attack surfaces, data flows, and vulnerability pathways without altering the operational structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS20250208615A1System and method for determining and predicting vulnerability of building management systems
Publication Date: 2025.06.26 TYCO FIRE & SECURITY GMBH
  • US20250208615A1 patent drawing
  • US20250208615A1 patent drawing
  • US20250208615A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for predicting the vulnerability of a building management system (BMS) includes one or more memory devices configured to store instructions that, when executed on one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to establish a first communication link to a first data source and receive a first data using a communication module communicatively coupled to the processor. The first data includes information related to at least one of a plurality of IoT-enabled devices. The system is further configured to generate a historical record composed of a plurality of received data feeds received from a plurality of data feeds at unanticipated time intervals and analyze at least one of the plurality of data feeds with at least one or more of: the first data, the historical record, and another of the plurality of data feeds to predict the vulnerability of the BMS.