Board Production Tracking for Real-Time Quality Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The production of boards often results in a significant amount of fall-out due to unpredictable combinations of parameters affecting quality, making it difficult to identify and address the specific causes of inferior quality, and reducing fall-out is challenging without slowing down production.

Innovation Solution

A method where each board is linked to an ID tag containing detailed production parameters, allowing for real-time monitoring and optimization using artificial intelligence, enabling direct quality feedback and adaptive production adjustments.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If production speed is maintained at high levels, then productivity is improved, but fall-out increases due to inability to identify and correct quality issues in real-time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction speedVSAvoidquality consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback system where ID tags attached to boards carry production parameters through all production stages. Measuring devices read these tags and feed quality data back to the control system in real-time, enabling immediate detection and correction of quality deviations without slowing down production.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical quality inspection methods with an automated system combining ID tags, optical/electronic measuring devices, and computer-controlled parameter adjustment. This substitution enables real-time quality monitoring and correction that maintains high production speeds while improving quality consistency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Manufacturing precision

If production parameters are monitored and adjusted in real-time, then manufacturing precision is improved, but device complexity increases due to additional ID tags and measuring devices

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality control accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The ID tags serve multiple functions: they identify individual boards, store production parameters, and enable tracking through all production stages. The measuring devices also perform multiple roles by reading ID tags, detecting quality parameters, and communicating with the control system, thereby reducing the need for separate dedicated components for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes changes in measurable parameters (dimensions, density, moisture content) of the boards during production as indicators of quality. By monitoring these natural parameter variations and comparing them against target values, the system achieves precise quality control without requiring complex specialized sensing equipment for each quality attribute.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If fall-out is reduced through traditional methods by lowering production speed, then quality control improves, but productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality controlVSAvoidproduction speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary quality assessment by continuously monitoring production parameters and comparing them against predetermined quality criteria during the production process itself. This allows potential quality issues to be detected and corrected before they result in defective boards, eliminating the need for post-production sorting and reducing fall-out without lowering production speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The real-time feedback loop enables immediate corrective action when quality deviations are detected. The control system automatically adjusts production parameters based on feedback from measuring devices, preventing the development of quality defects that would otherwise require production slowdowns or stoppages for manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentEP4721901A1A method for producing boards
Publication Date: 2026.04.08 UNILIN BVBA
  • EP4721901A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4721901A1 patent drawing
  • EP4721901A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for producing boards, wherein raw material (6) is provided and production steps are performed to obtain said boards, with half products formed during said production steps, wherein the productions steps comprise at least the following production steps: -a basic step wherein at least said raw material (6) is transported to a shaping unit (1); -a shaping step, wherein said raw material (6) is formed into plate shaped material to form a plate shaped half product (7); -a sawing step wherein said plate shaped half product (7) is sawn to board shaped half products (8); wherein these board shaped half products (8) are formed into respective boards, wherein, a number of boards is linked to a respective ID tag or comprises a respective ID tag, wherein said ID tags comprise individual data about parameters relating to production steps of said respective boards.