Passenger boarding bridge backward travel determiner

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing passenger boarding bridges often require manual operation by skilled operators to dock and undock, leading to risks of incorrect docking or undocking due to operator error, especially when the direction of travel wheels is not clearly communicated, potentially hindering the process.

Innovation Solution

A passenger boarding bridge system that includes a determiner to assess the possibility of backward travel causing incorrect docking by monitoring the position of the cab relative to the aircraft using an orthogonal coordinate system and distance sensors, providing warnings or restricting backward travel to prevent such occurrences.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If manual operation by operator is used to control docking and undocking, then the system can be operated with simple control mechanisms, but the reliability of docking operation deteriorates due to operator error and lack of awareness of current state

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol mechanismVSAvoiddocking operation
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates a determiner that automatically determines whether the cab is approaching the aircraft by monitoring the relationship between the cab position and aircraft position. This feedback mechanism provides real-time information about the docking state, enabling the system to automatically prevent incorrect operations (forward travel when docked, backward travel when approaching) without requiring complex manual control procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The travel control device performs self-service by automatically controlling the travel wheels based on the determined docking state. The system monitors its own state and autonomously prevents incorrect operations, eliminating the need for operator judgment and manual intervention in determining docking status.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If the system prohibits forward travel when limit switch detects docking, then docking safety is improved, but the ease of operation deteriorates when operator needs to undock by backward travel but system prevents forward travel

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedocking safetyVSAvoidundocking operation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The determiner continuously monitors the cab-aircraft relationship and provides accurate feedback about whether the cab is approaching or has docked. This eliminates the ambiguity that arises with simple limit switches, as the system can distinguish between different docking states and provide appropriate travel control instructions, maintaining both safety and operational clarity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical limit switch system with an automated determination system that uses sensors and control logic to monitor docking state. This substitution provides more precise and reliable state detection, eliminating the confusion that occurs when operators rely on limit switch signals that may not accurately reflect the true docking status.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Device complexity

If operator skill determines docking accuracy, then the system can use simple control mechanisms, but the adaptability deteriorates when different operators with varying skills operate the same system

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol systemVSAvoidoperator independence
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-determination of docking state through the determiner, which automatically monitors and assesses whether the cab is approaching the aircraft. This eliminates the need for operator skill in judging docking status, allowing any operator to safely and accurately perform docking and undocking operations regardless of their experience level.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The automated feedback mechanism provides consistent and accurate information about docking state to all operators, ensuring uniform operation quality across different skill levels. The system compensates for operator variability by providing objective real-time information about cab-aircraft relationship.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20230202683A1Passenger boarding bridge
Publication Date: 2023.06.29 SHINMAYWA INDUSTRIES LTD
  • US20230202683A1 patent drawing
  • US20230202683A1 patent drawing
  • US20230202683A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A passenger boarding bridge is capable of avoiding docking by backward travel of travel wheels. The passenger boarding bridge includes: a rotunda connected to an entrance of a terminal building and supported to be rotatable horizontally; an extendable and retractable tunnel unit whose proximal end is connected to the rotunda; a cab provided at a distal end of the tunnel unit; travel wheels configured to travel forward and backward in changeable directions; an operating device that is operated to input an operation command to the travel wheels; and a determiner configured to, during a period from when the cab starts being moved from a predetermined position, until the cab is docked with an aircraft, while the travel wheels are traveling backward, perform determination whether or not there is a possibility that the cab will come closer to the aircraft to get docked with the aircraft.