Autonomous Passenger Boarding Bridge Navigation via Machine Learning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The complex environment of aircraft operating areas and non-standard designs of passenger boarding bridges pose challenges for automated navigation and collision avoidance of equipment devices such as passenger boarding bridges.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method using an autonomous control computing system that receives images from digital cameras, employs machine learning models to detect self and intruder objects, predicts future locations of self objects, and alters navigation paths to prevent collisions with intruder objects.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If automated navigation systems are implemented for passenger boarding bridges, then operational efficiency is improved, but the complexity of the control system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational efficiencyVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical navigation control with an automated computer vision-based navigation system. The system uses cameras to capture images of the aircraft operating area, processes these images through machine learning models to detect objects and navigate the boarding bridge autonomously, thereby improving operational efficiency while managing system complexity through software-based solutions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The navigation system enables the passenger boarding bridge to navigate and position itself autonomously without human intervention. The system independently detects its own position, identifies obstacles and targets, plans navigation paths, and executes movement commands, making the system self-sufficient and improving operational efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If machine learning models are used to detect objects in complex environments, then collision avoidance capability is improved, but computational requirements and system complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision avoidance capabilityVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical sensors and simple detection algorithms with machine learning models that process camera images to detect objects, predict their movements, and assess collision risks. This substitution enables more accurate and reliable collision avoidance in complex environments by leveraging pattern recognition and predictive analytics from visual data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously captures images of the aircraft operating area, processes these images through machine learning models to detect objects and their movements, predicts future positions, and adjusts the navigation path in real-time based on these feedback loops. This continuous feedback mechanism improves collision avoidance capability by adapting to dynamic environmental changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Adaptability or versatility

If autonomous navigation is implemented without standardization, then adaptability to different aircraft types is improved, but the difficulty of detecting and measuring objects increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to different aircraft typesVSAvoidobject detection difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a universal machine learning model that can detect and recognize various types of objects in the aircraft operating area, including different aircraft models, ground vehicles, and equipment. The model is trained on diverse data to generalize across different object types and environments, enabling the system to adapt to various aircraft types and operational scenarios while maintaining consistent object detection capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts detection parameters and navigation constraints based on the detected aircraft type and operational context. By changing parameters such as detection sensitivity, path planning constraints, and safety margins according to the specific aircraft configuration and environment, the system maintains high adaptability while managing detection difficulty through context-aware parameter optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20250178748A1Autonomous operation of passenger boarding bridges
Publication Date: 2025.06.05 OSHKOSH AEROTECH LLC
  • US20250178748A1 patent drawing
  • US20250178748A1 patent drawing
  • US20250178748A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for automatically determining a distance to an object in a two-dimensional image of an aircraft operating area. The system includes one or more processors configured to acquire at least one image captured by at least one camera of the aircraft operating area, detect the object in the at least one image where an identifier of the object and a component of the object are visible in the at least one image, acquire a dimension of the component of the object based on the identifier, determine a size of the component in the at least one image, and determine the distance between the component of the object and the at least one camera based on the dimension of the component and the size of the component in the at least one image.