Boarding Zone Trajectory Deconfliction for Autonomous Vehicle Dispatch

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing autonomous vehicle control systems are susceptible to causing traffic jams, collisions, and other adverse encounters, and may be inflexible or inefficient, negatively impacting system operation and user experience.

Innovation Solution

A transportation system that employs multiple vehicle trajectory control schemes, including spacetime trajectories and trajectory comparison deconfliction techniques, to ensure safe, efficient, and flexible vehicle operations by determining non-intersecting paths and trajectories for autonomous vehicles using a control system that includes a dispatch system with trunk and boarding zone routers.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a single vehicle control system is used, then the system structure is simple, but traffic jams and collisions occur frequently

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system is divided into two independent but coordinated components: a dispatch system that manages high-level routing and a trajectory control system that executes low-level path following. This segmentation allows each component to specialize in its function, improving overall safety while keeping individual components manageable in complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A trajectory deconfliction system acts as an intermediary between the dispatch system and the vehicle control system. It receives trajectory requests, checks for conflicts with other vehicles, and only approves trajectories that are safe, thereby preventing collisions without requiring direct complex interaction between all vehicles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If traditional trajectory control is used, then the control logic is simple, but traffic jams and adverse encounters occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem efficiencyVSAvoidtrajectory control scheme
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary trajectory deconfliction before vehicles execute their paths. By checking for conflicts in advance and adjusting trajectories proactively, the system prevents traffic jams and adverse encounters rather than reacting to them after they occur, improving overall system efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The trajectory control system continuously monitors vehicle positions and adjusts trajectories based on real-time feedback about other vehicles' locations and planned paths. This feedback mechanism allows the system to dynamically resolve conflicts and maintain efficient traffic flow.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Adaptability or versatility

If fixed routing is used, then the control system is simple, but the system is inflexible and inefficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational flexibilityVSAvoidrouting system
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The routing system transitions from static fixed routes to dynamic trajectories that can be adjusted in real-time. Vehicles receive trajectory instructions that can be modified based on current traffic conditions, other vehicles' positions, and changing operational requirements, providing flexibility while maintaining systematic control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes trajectory parameters (position, speed, timing) dynamically based on real-time conditions. Instead of fixed routes, the control system adjusts multiple parameters of vehicle paths to optimize for safety and efficiency while adapting to changing circumstances.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20250388237A1Deconfliction operations as departure and arrival triggers
Publication Date: 2025.12.25 GLYDWAYS INC
  • US20250388237A1 patent drawing
  • US20250388237A1 patent drawing
  • US20250388237A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method may include receiving a trip request specifying an origin boarding zone and a destination boarding zone, selecting a vehicle for the trip request, determining a path for the trip request, the path extending from the origin boarding zone, along at least a portion of a trunk lane of a roadway system, to the destination boarding zone, receiving an indication that the vehicle is prepared to depart from a parking spot at the origin boarding zone, and in response to receiving the indication, determining a proposed trajectory segment from a parking spot at the origin boarding zone to the trunk lane of the roadway system, determining whether the proposed trajectory segment will cause the vehicle to contact other respective vehicles traversing other respective trajectory segments in the origin boarding zone, and causing the vehicle to depart the parking spot and travel along the proposed trajectory segment.