Blade Outer Air Seal Cooling Passage Geometry for Thermal Integrity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The blade outer air seal (BOAS) in gas turbine engines faces integrity issues due to temperature extremes and harsh environmental conditions, requiring effective cooling to maintain its integrity, but existing designs struggle with optimal cooling passage geometry and wall thickness, which can lead to either inadequate cooling or excessive material usage.

Innovation Solution

The BOAS assembly features a leading edge periphery with a distance of 0.05 cm to 0.2 cm between the leading edge wall and cooling passage, with elongated aft cooling passages of discorectangle or rounded rectangle geometry, and varying configurations such as tilted, undercut, or bent leading edge cooling passages to optimize wall thickness and cooling efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If the distance between the leading edge wall and cooling passage is reduced, then cooling efficiency is improved, but wall thickness becomes too thin causing casting defects

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooling efficiencyVSAvoidwall thickness uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by varying the distance between the leading edge wall and cooling passage along the leading edge. Specifically, the distance is reduced at certain locations to enhance cooling efficiency where thermal loads are highest, while maintaining adequate distance at other locations to prevent casting defects. This localized optimization allows different regions of the leading edge to have different wall thickness characteristics suited to their specific thermal environments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Ease of manufacture

If cooling passage geometry is simplified, then manufacturing is easier, but cooling efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecasting complexityVSAvoidcooling efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs curved or rounded geometries for the cooling passages, particularly at transitions and intersections, rather than sharp corners or abrupt changes. This curvature approach maintains smooth airflow through the passages, preventing flow separation and enhancing cooling efficiency. Simultaneously, the rounded geometries are more amenable to casting processes compared to sharp features, thus balancing manufacturing ease with thermal performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

3Manufacturing precision

If wall thickness is increased, then casting defects are prevented, but material usage and weight increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecasting qualityVSAvoidBOAS assembly weight
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent utilizes parameter changes by varying the wall thickness and cooling passage distance as continuous variables along the leading edge geometry. Rather than using a uniform wall thickness, the design optimizes these parameters locally based on thermal load distribution, allowing minimum wall thickness to be used where cooling demands are highest while maintaining adequate thickness elsewhere. This parametric optimization reduces overall material usage and weight while preventing casting defects through localized thickness control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design maintains a desirable wall thickness, preventing casting defects while enhancing cooling efficiency, effectively managing thermal loads and environmental conditions, thus improving the durability and performance of the BOAS assembly.

Implementation Method 1

The BOAS assembly is in fluid communication with a source of cooling air... The leading edge periphery is configured to substantially maintain a distance between the leading edge wall and the leading edge cooling passage

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectConvection: Convection

Implementation Method 2

effectively managing thermal loads and environmental conditions

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal conduction: Conduction (thermal)

Data Source

PatentEP3156613B1Blade outer air seal
Publication Date: 2022.06.15 RTX CORP
  • EP3156613B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3156613B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3156613B1 patent drawingFigure 3A~3B

AI summary

According to various embodiments, disclosed is a blade outer air seal assembly (50) for a turbine engine (20) comprising a main body portion (54) that extends generally axially, with respect to a central axis (A) of the turbine engine (20), from a leading edge portion (56) of the main body portion (54) to a trailing edge portion (58) of the main body portion (54), wherein the leading edge portion (56) includes a leading edge wall (56a) having an undercut profile (56b) along at least a portion of the leading edge wall (56a), wherein the main body portion (54) comprises cooling passages (86) comprising a leading edge cooling passage (86a) adjacent to the leading edge wall (56a), having a leading edge periphery (87) on a side of the leading edge cooling passage (86a) adjacent to the leading edge wall (56a), which generally conforms to the undercut profile (56b) of the leading edge wall (56a).