V-Shaped Boat Bow With Step Portions For Drag Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current bow designs for planing boats, particularly those with deep V-shapes, face challenges in reducing water resistance and fuel consumption while maintaining safety and comfort, as they tend to submerge in waves, leading to increased drag and energy loss.

Innovation Solution

The development of a bow structure with a V-shaped design featuring a base portion and skid with strategically placed steps and protrusions that cause water flow separation and air entry, resulting in atomization and reduced friction, combining the advantages of flat and deep-V hulls to enhance sliding capacity and fuel efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a deep V-shaped bow is used, then the boat can cut through waves and reduce impacts, but the bow submerges in waves leading to increased water resistance and fuel consumption

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewave cutting capabilityVSAvoidfuel consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The bow is divided into multiple functional zones with different deadrise angles: a first base portion with a first deadrise angle, a second base portion with a second deadrise angle, and a third base portion with a third deadrise angle. This segmentation allows each zone to perform its specific function - the forward portion cuts waves while the aft portions reduce wetted surface area and resistance, resolving the contradiction between wave cutting capability and fuel consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different portions of the bow are given different local geometric properties (deadrise angles) optimized for their specific functions. The forward base portion has a larger deadrise angle for wave cutting, while the aft base portions have smaller deadrise angles for reducing resistance. This local optimization resolves the contradiction by applying the right geometric quality in the right location.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Stability of the object's composition

If the bow is made longer with distributed slope to add volume and improve safety, then passenger capacity and stability increase, but the boat becomes heavier and requires more power

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepassenger safety and stabilityVSAvoidboat weight
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The bow volume is created through segmented base portions (first, second, and third base portions) that progressively change in deadrise angle. This segmentation provides the necessary volume for passenger safety and stability without requiring excessive overall length, thereby avoiding the penalty of increased weight and power requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The deadrise angle parameter is changed progressively across different base portions. By varying this geometric parameter along the length of the bow, the design achieves optimal volume distribution for safety and stability while controlling the overall weight of the vessel.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If a flat hull is used, then the boat can plane quickly and reduce fuel consumption, but the hull cannot cut through waves effectively

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveplaning speedVSAvoidwave cutting capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The hull combines flat bottom characteristics with localized V-shaped sections. The base portions create a V-shaped bow configuration that provides wave cutting capability, while the overall hull maintains a flat bottom for quick planing. This local quality differentiation resolves the contradiction between planing performance and wave cutting capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration reduces water resistance, increases buoyancy, and mitigates slamming impacts, leading to improved speed, comfort, and fuel savings, while providing greater safety and stability for passengers.

Implementation Method 1

the first lateral step portion is arranged such as to cause water flow separation from the bow, resulting in cavitation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFlow separation: Flow Separation

Implementation Method 2

the first lateral step portion is arranged such as to cause water flow separation from the bow, resulting in cavitation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCavitation: Cavitation

Implementation Method 3

obtaining an atomization of the water at the surface that results in a reduction of the resistance

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAtomization:

Implementation Method 4

the first lateral step portion is a step inwards as seen from the front constituting an air channel with an air inlet

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAir entrainment: Air Entrainment

Data Source

PatentEP3066003B1Bows of boats
Publication Date: 2019.05.15 QUER PUIGNAU JOSEP MARIA
  • EP3066003B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3066003B1 patent drawingFigure 3~5b
  • EP3066003B1 patent drawingFigure 5~6

AI summary

The present disclosure relates to bows for a hull of a vessel being substantially V- shaped and having a stem and a keel, and wherein in the vicinity of the keel and/or stem, the bow comprises an outer surface with step portions which can cause water flow separation from the bow, resulting in cavitation. The bows may comprise a skid along its keel. The disclosure further relates to hulls and vessels and methods for manufacturing.