Boat Hull Flow Modifiers for Wake Shape Tuning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current boat hull designs do not adequately address the need for customizable wake shapes for various water sports, as they fail to effectively modify the primary wake generated by a boat, leading to suboptimal conditions for athletes engaging in activities like wakeboarding and wakesurfing.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of discrete flow modifiers below the boat hull, which can be shaped and positioned to generate secondary wakes through constructive or destructive interference with the primary wake, allowing for adjustable wake height and reduction of turbulence, thereby enhancing the wake shape for specific water sports.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If conventional boat hull designs are used, then the structure is simple and easy to manufacture, but the wake shape cannot be effectively modified for different water sports

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewake shape customizationVSAvoidhull structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The wake modification system is segmented into multiple independent flow modifiers (wakesurfing tabs) that can be individually positioned and adjusted on the hull. Each tab can be independently configured to create specific wake patterns, allowing versatile wake shaping without requiring complete hull redesign.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The flow modifiers are designed to be adjustable and reconfigurable rather than fixed. The tabs can be positioned at different locations and angles on the hull, and their configuration can be changed to adapt to different water sports requirements, providing dynamic wake shape customization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Manufacturing precision

If flow modifiers are added to modify wake shape, then wake shape control is improved, but device complexity and manufacturing difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewake shape precisionVSAvoidhull manufacturing ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of modifying the entire hull structure, only specific localized flow modifiers are added to the hull surface. This partial action approach achieves precise wake shape control at the flow separation points without requiring complex manufacturing of the entire hull.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The flow modifiers are designed as separate, relatively simple components that can be manufactured independently and attached to the hull. This allows for easier manufacturing and replacement compared to integrating wake control features directly into the hull structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple flow modifiers are installed to achieve desired wake cross section, then wake tuning capability is improved, but installation complexity and maintenance difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewake tuning capabilityVSAvoidmodifier installation and removal ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of repair

Solution Approach 1:

The wake tuning system is divided into multiple independent flow modifiers that can be individually installed, adjusted, and removed. This segmentation allows for flexible configuration changes without requiring complete system disassembly, improving ease of repair and reconfiguration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The flow modifiers are designed to be removable and reconfigurable components. When wake tuning requirements change, individual modifiers can be removed or repositioned without permanent installation, allowing for easy adaptation to different water sports needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution enables precise tuning of wake shapes, providing a flatter skiing surface, increased wake height for wakeboarding, and reduced turbulence, thereby improving the experience and safety for athletes by modifying the wake cross-section through secondary wake interference.

Implementation Method 1

A primary wake is caused by the flow of water around the underside of the boat hull and one or more secondary wakes interfere, constructively or destructively, with portions of the primary wake

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFlow separation: Flow Separation

Implementation Method 2

one or more secondary wakes interfere, constructively or destructively, with portions of the primary wake to generate the modified wake cross section

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectWave interference: Interference

Data Source

PatentUS11987325B1Devices and methods for wake tuning
Publication Date: 2024.05.21 CORRECT CRAFT IP HLDG
  • US11987325B1 patent drawing
  • US11987325B1 patent drawing
  • US11987325B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Flow modifiers are positioned at one or more discrete points along the underside of a boat hull to generate secondary wakes that interfere with the primary wake generated by the boat hull and result in a desired modified wake useful for various watersports. The flow modifiers are formed integrally with the boat hull or affixed thereto, and can be selectively extendable and retractable relative thereto.