Boat Kill Switch with Proximity Sensors

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing boat safety systems fail to effectively prevent propeller injuries and damage by not adequately detecting people or objects in close proximity to spinning propellers and submerged hazards, and do not ensure the boat captain is present and positioned to operate the vessel safely.

Innovation Solution

A wireless boat safety system that includes a kill switch communicatively linked to a fob worn by the captain, proximity sensors around the stern to detect objects near the propeller, and sensors to monitor the ladder and captain's position, preventing the motor from starting or propeller engagement when hazards are detected or the captain is not present.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Difficulty of detecting and measuring

If traditional kill switches with lanyards are used, then the captain can control the motor manually, but the system cannot detect proximity of people or objects to the propeller

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection of people or objects near propellerVSAvoidcomplexity of safety system
Core Design Contradiction:
Difficulty of detecting and measuringVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The safety system is divided into multiple independent sensor modules (proximity sensors, ladder position sensors, captain presence sensors) that each perform a specific detection function. These segmented sensors work together to provide comprehensive safety monitoring without requiring a single complex system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The kill switch assembly serves multiple functions: it traditionally controls motor operation and now also integrates wireless communication with sensors to detect various safety conditions (people proximity, ladder position, captain presence). This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If proximity sensors and multiple safety sensors are added, then detection capability is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety of propeller operationVSAvoidnumber of sensors and switches
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple sensor functions are merged into a single integrated kill switch assembly that processes inputs from proximity sensors, ladder position sensors, and captain presence sensors. This consolidation reduces system complexity while maintaining comprehensive safety monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors safety conditions through sensors and provides real-time feedback to the kill switch, which automatically prevents motor operation when hazards are detected. This feedback mechanism ensures reliable safety without requiring complex manual intervention systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Object-affected harmful factors

If the motor can start freely without sensor monitoring, then ease of operation is maintained, but the risk of propeller injuries increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverisk of propeller injury to peopleVSAvoidease of motor operation
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The safety system operates autonomously by automatically detecting hazards through sensors and preventing motor operation when necessary, without requiring manual intervention or complex user actions. The system serves itself by making safety decisions based on sensor inputs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The kill switch acts as an intermediary between the motor and the operator, introducing safety conditions that must be met before the motor can operate. This intermediary layer filters out harmful situations while allowing normal operation to proceed when safe.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Difficulty of detecting and measuring

If wireless communication with fob is implemented, then captain presence can be verified remotely, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection of captain presenceVSAvoidwireless communication system
Core Design Contradiction:
Difficulty of detecting and measuringVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The traditional mechanical lanyard kill switch is replaced with a wireless communication system using a fob and receiver. This substitution eliminates the need for physical contact while maintaining the safety function of verifying captain presence, and the wireless components can be integrated into existing boat electronics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS12065231B2Boat safety system
Publication Date: 2024.08.20 SEA-SMART LLC
  • US12065231B2 patent drawing
  • US12065231B2 patent drawing
  • US12065231B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A safety system for a boat, watercraft or other vehicle includes a kill switch connected to the motor for preventing the motor from running under dangerous circumstances. The system includes at least one proximity sensor operatively connected to the kill switch, so that the motor only runs when the proximity sensor detects a person properly positioned at the captain's console. Other sensors may form an array to communicate with the kill switch, either hard-wired together or wirelessly, upon detection of dangerous situations, including proximity sensors to detect if a swimmer is near the propeller or if the captain is not in position at the helm, gate sensors to detect when gates on the boat are in an open position, and ladder sensors to detect when a ladder is in a down position. The system may also include at least one rear facing camera operatively connected to a console-mounted video screen.