Gyroscopic Boat Roll Stabilizer Cooling for Rapid Flywheel Spin-Up

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing gyroscopic boat stabilization systems using control moment gyroscopes (CMGs) face challenges such as heat buildup leading to bearing failure, slow spin-up and spin-down times, and noise disruption due to inefficient heat dissipation and limited motor size, which restrict their effectiveness and usability in shorter boat trips.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a gyroscopic roll stabilizer with a bearing cooling system that uses a heat sink and liquid coolant to efficiently dissipate heat from the flywheel bearings, allowing for faster acceleration and deceleration of the flywheel assembly, and a more powerful motor to reduce spin-up and spin-down times.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If the flywheel is contained in a vacuum enclosure to achieve high spin rate, then the gyroscopic stabilization effect is improved, but heat dissipation becomes problematic and bearing failure risk increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflywheel spin rateVSAvoidbearing temperature
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSTemperature

Solution Approach 1:

The system is divided into two functional zones: a vacuum enclosure for the flywheel to minimize aerodynamic drag and achieve high spin rates, and an external cooling system with heat exchangers to manage bearing temperatures. This segmentation allows each component to operate in its optimal environment without compromising the other.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A magnetic coupling mechanism serves as an intermediary between the motor (outside the vacuum) and the flywheel (inside the vacuum). This eliminates the need for a physical shaft that would penetrate the vacuum seal and introduce friction points, while still allowing torque transmission to achieve high spin rates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Loss of time

If a more powerful motor is used to reduce spin-up time, then the engagement time is improved, but heat generation and bearing stress increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespin-up timeVSAvoidbearing reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The cooling system is pre-configured with heat exchangers and coolant circulation paths that are ready before motor engagement. Thermal management is initiated in advance to ensure bearings can withstand the increased thermal load from higher-power motor operation during rapid spin-up.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts motor power output and coolant flow rates based on operational phase. During spin-up, the motor operates at high power with increased coolant flow to manage the elevated thermal load, then transitions to normal operating parameters once the flywheel reaches target speed, optimizing both response time and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Use of energy by moving object

If the flywheel is made larger to increase energy storage, then the stabilization effectiveness is improved, but the spin-up time and device complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy storage capacityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of increasing flywheel mass linearly to boost energy storage, the system utilizes the vacuum environment to reduce aerodynamic drag, enabling the flywheel to reach much higher rotational speeds. This dimensional shift from mass-based to speed-based energy storage allows compact flywheel design while maintaining high energy capacity and reducing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution enables rapid engagement and disengagement of the CMG, reducing the time to achieve operational speed from hours to minutes, enhancing its usability for short trips and minimizing noise and vibration disruption.

Implementation Method 1

Heat is transferred from the flywheel shaft to the heat sink and then by solid and/or liquid conduction to the heat exchanger

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat conduction: Conduction (thermal)

Implementation Method 2

cooling is achieved by delivering a liquid coolant into a tapered cavity in the end of the flywheel shaft

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectConvection: Convection

Implementation Method 3

The cavity is shaped so that the centrifugal force causes the liquid coolant to flow towards the open end of the shaft

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCentrifugal force: Centrifugal Force

Implementation Method 4

Gyroscopic boat stabilization is another technology for roll suppression that is based on the gyroscopic effect. A control moment gyroscope (CMG) is mounted in the boat and generates a torque that can be used to counteract the rolling motion of the boat

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGyroscopic effect: Gyroscope

Data Source

PatentUS11891157B2Gyroscopic boat roll stabilizer
Publication Date: 2024.02.06 WAVETAMER LLC
  • US11891157B2 patent drawing
  • US11891157B2 patent drawing
  • US11891157B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A gyroscopic roll stabilizer comprises a gimbal having a support frame and enclosure configured to maintain a below-ambient pressure, a flywheel assembly including a flywheel and flywheel shaft, one or more bearings for rotatably mounting the flywheel inside the enclosure, a motor for rotating the flywheel, and bearing cooling system for cooling the bearings supporting the flywheel. For smaller units, the bearing cooling system is effective to enable a flywheel with a moment of inertia less than 40,000 lb in2 to be accelerated at a rate of 5 rpm/s or greater. For larger units, the bearing cooling system is effective to enable a flywheel with a moment of inertia greater than 40,000 lb in2 to be accelerated at a rate of 2.5 rpm/s or greater.