Boiler Controller Foam Detection Stabilization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current foam detection algorithms in steam boiler systems lead to irregular shutdowns due to varying probe resistance caused by boiling waves, water quality changes, cold water addition, and rapid water level changes in small boilers, resulting in faulty foam condition declarations.

Innovation Solution

A boiler controller with a signal processor implementing a boiler control algorithm that stabilizes water level detection, dynamically adjusts foam thresholds based on water quality, and verifies consecutive water level drops before initiating the foam algorithm, ensuring accurate foam condition detection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If water sample data is averaged over a period of time for foam detection, then the foam detection algorithm becomes simpler to implement, but the system produces false foam condition declarations due to probe resistance variations from boiling waves, water level changes, and temperature fluctuations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefoam detection algorithm complexityVSAvoidfoam condition detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary water level stabilization detection before initiating the foam detection algorithm. The controller monitors water level changes and only starts foam detection after confirming the water level has stabilized for a predetermined period, preventing false detections during transient phases when probe resistance varies due to boiling waves or rapid level changes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors probe resistance data and compares it against dynamically adjusted thresholds. The controller evaluates whether water level has stabilized based on feedback from consecutive probe readings, and only enables foam detection when stabilization criteria are met, creating a feedback loop that prevents false foam condition declarations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Speed

If the foam detection algorithm starts immediately when the boiler is turned ON, then the system responds faster to actual foam conditions, but it causes irregular shutdowns due to probe resistance variations during initial boiling and water level stabilization

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefoam detection response speedVSAvoidboiler shutdown accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The controller performs preliminary monitoring of water level stabilization immediately when the boiler is turned ON, before initiating the foam detection algorithm. This preliminary action delays foam detection until the water level stabilizes, preventing irregular shutdowns during transient phases while maintaining rapid response capability once stabilization is confirmed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the operational state of the foam detection algorithm based on real-time water level stability conditions. The controller transitions the foam detection algorithm from an inactive state during water level changes to an active state when stabilization is detected, optimizing both response speed and reliability according to operating conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Device complexity

If a fixed foam threshold is used for detection, then the algorithm is easier to implement, but it cannot adapt to different water qualities, boiler sizes, and operating conditions leading to false detections

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethreshold adjustment mechanism complexityVSAvoidwater quality and operating condition adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements dynamic threshold adjustment based on real-time detection of water level stabilization. The foam detection threshold is activated and adjusted only when the controller determines that water level has stabilized, allowing the system to adapt to different water qualities, boiler sizes, and operating conditions without requiring complex manual threshold configuration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The controller changes the operational parameters of the foam detection algorithm based on detected water level stability. When stabilization is detected, the system adjusts the detection parameters and thresholds to be appropriate for the current operating conditions, enabling adaptability across different boiler types and water qualities without increasing algorithmic complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution prevents unnecessary boiler shutdowns by stabilizing water level detection and dynamically adjusting foam thresholds, enhancing the accuracy of foam condition detection and reducing false alarms.

Implementation Method 1

Probe resistance continuously varies inside the boiler due to the waves when the water starts boiling

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical Resistance: Electrical Resistance

Data Source

PatentUS10429063B2Smart algorithm to determine “steam boiler water condition”
Publication Date: 2019.10.01 FLUID HANDLING LLC
  • US10429063B2 patent drawing
  • US10429063B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A technique for determining a boiler water condition includes a boiler controller (aka PSE unit) having a signal processor that implements a boiler control algorithm to receive signaling containing information about sets of N consecutive probe data samples related to a boiler water condition; determine stable average signaling containing information about a stable average by averaging a set of N consecutive probe data samples in the signaling received; determine present stable average signaling containing information about a present stable average by averaging a present set of N consecutive probe data samples in the signaling received; and determine corresponding signaling containing information about the boiler water condition, based upon whether the present stable average is within an allowable limit and a comparison of the present and previous stable average signaling determined.