Boiler Output Control Using Zone Temperature Rise Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing heating systems waste energy due to boilers operating at maximum capacity, leading to inefficient heat distribution and rapid temperature rises, which result in overheating and increased standby losses, as they lack feedback mechanisms to adjust heat input rates and account for zone size and external factors.

Innovation Solution

A method to control the power output of a boiler by receiving heating demand signals and applying a scaling factor calculated based on temperature increase measurements, allowing for accurate matching of heat requirements to zone size and external conditions, thereby optimizing temperature increase rates and reducing energy waste.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the boiler operates at maximum output to satisfy heating demand, then the heating requirement is met, but energy is wasted due to rapid temperature rise and increased standby losses

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheating demand satisfactionVSAvoidstandby losses
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system measures the actual rate of temperature increase in the zone and uses this feedback to adjust the boiler power output. The control system continuously monitors temperature rise and modifies the heating power to maintain the optimal rate, preventing both overheating and excessive standby losses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The boiler power output is made dynamic rather than fixed at maximum capacity. The system adjusts the power output in real-time based on the measured temperature increase rate, allowing the heating system to adapt to changing conditions and optimize energy efficiency while meeting heating demands.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If the boiler delivers maximum output to the heating load, then heating demand is satisfied, but the water temperature increases faster than optimal for energy efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheating load satisfactionVSAvoidenergy efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The control system uses feedback from temperature sensors to measure the actual rate of temperature increase and adjusts the boiler power output accordingly. This closed-loop control ensures the water temperature rises at the optimal rate for energy efficiency while still satisfying the heating load.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the operating parameters of the boiler by adjusting the power output based on the measured temperature increase rate. By modifying the power parameter dynamically, the system optimizes energy efficiency while maintaining adequate heating performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Speed

If the return water temperature increases due to rapid heating, then heating demand is met quickly, but the boiler efficiency decreases as heat exchange with flue gases becomes less effective

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheating response speedVSAvoidheat exchange efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The boiler power output is dynamically adjusted to prevent the return water temperature from rising too quickly. By controlling the rate of temperature increase, the system maintains an optimal temperature differential for heat exchange with flue gases, preserving boiler efficiency while still responding to heating demands.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system takes preliminary action to prevent the return water temperature from rising too high by adjusting the boiler power output before the temperature differential becomes excessive. This proactive control maintains effective heat exchange efficiency throughout the heating process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

4Ease of operation

If the burner cycles rapidly to match zone heat loss with boiler output, then temperature control is attempted, but standby losses increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetemperature controlVSAvoidstandby losses
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses continuous feedback from temperature sensors to control the burner operation. By measuring the actual temperature increase rate and adjusting the power output accordingly, the system achieves smooth temperature control without rapid cycling, thereby minimizing standby losses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The control system maintains continuous useful action by adjusting the boiler power output smoothly rather than cycling the burner on and off rapidly. This continuous adjustment ensures consistent heating while minimizing the time the boiler spends in standby mode, reducing energy losses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

5Area of stationary object

If radiators are installed without proper sizing for zone requirements, then heating coverage is provided, but the temperature difference across radiators is sub-optimal and return temperature increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheating coverageVSAvoidreturn temperature
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSTemperature

Solution Approach 1:

The control system measures the actual rate of temperature increase in the zone and uses this feedback to adjust the boiler power output. This compensates for sub-optimal radiator sizing by controlling the overall heat input rate to maintain efficient operating temperatures and prevent excessive return water temperature.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentEP3859485B1Adaptive boiler control
Publication Date: 2024.03.06 PITTWAY SARL
  • EP3859485B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3859485B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3859485B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The present disclosure relates to a method of controlling a power output of a boiler to a heating apparatus located in a zone. The method comprises the steps of: a. receiving a heating demand signal from the zone (402); b. deriving the boiler power output based on the heating demand signal and also based on a scaling factor for the zone (404); and c. controlling the boiler to generate the boiler power output (408). The scaling factor has been calculated based on the steps of: i. measuring the rate of temperature increase in the zone under a plurality of different boiler power outputs (453); and ii. using the measurements in step (i), to learn the magnitude of the scaling factor for achieving a desired design rate of temperature increase in the zone (454).