Marine Vessel Bollard Push Control for Drift Detection and Hold

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

During a bollard push manoeuvre, marine vessels can unexpectedly drift due to external factors like wind or dock movement, posing safety risks if not corrected promptly and accurately by the operator.

Innovation Solution

A method and control unit that monitor the vessel's position and heading, deactivating the bollard push function if deviations exceed predetermined values, and automatically switch to a position hold function to prevent further drift, using multiple drive units to maintain contact with the dock using controlled thrust.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual monitoring and correction of vessel position is used during bollard push manoeuvre, then operator can respond to drift, but response time is insufficient and correction may not be swift enough to prevent dangerous situations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety of bollard push manoeuvreVSAvoidresponse time to detect and correct drift
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The control system continuously monitors vessel position using sensors (GPS, motion sensors, cameras) and provides real-time feedback to the control unit. When drift exceeds predetermined thresholds, the system automatically generates correction commands to drive units, creating a closed-loop control system that eliminates manual monitoring delays.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The vessel's control system performs self-correction of position drift without operator intervention. The control unit automatically detects drift conditions and activates drive units to counteract the drift, enabling the system to service itself and respond instantaneously to position changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If operator manually operates propulsion system to correct vessel drift, then correction can be made, but complex manual interventions are required and operator skill and speed are limiting factors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of drift correctionVSAvoidcomplexity of manual intervention required
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The control system automatically detects vessel drift using sensor data and calculates the required correction thrust. The control unit autonomously operates drive units to counteract drift, eliminating the need for operator skill in judging drift magnitude and selecting appropriate correction maneuvers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical control operations with an automated electronic control system. Sensors, control units, and electronic actuation of drive units substitute for manual throttle and steering operations, removing human skill limitations from the correction process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If automated position monitoring is implemented, then drift detection is immediate, but device complexity increases with additional sensors and control systems

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracy of vessel driftVSAvoidcomplexity of monitoring and control system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system integrates multiple functions into a single automated platform: position monitoring, drift detection, correction calculation, and drive unit actuation. This multi-functional integration reduces the need for separate manual systems and operators while improving detection accuracy through continuous automated sensing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Reliability

If predetermined drift thresholds are set for automatic deactivation, then safety is improved by preventing excessive drift, but the bollard push function may be deactivated during normal operational variations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety threshold enforcementVSAvoidavailability of bollard push function
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system dynamically adjusts drift thresholds based on operational conditions such as vessel size, environmental factors (wind, current), and dock characteristics. This dynamic thresholding prevents premature deactivation during normal variations while ensuring safety by deactivating only when drift exceeds context-appropriate limits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentEP4154079B1Control method and control unit for a marine vessel
Publication Date: 2024.07.03 CPAC SYST
  • EP4154079B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4154079B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4154079B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The disclosure relates to a method to control a marine vessel (100) comprising two or more drive units (102, 103); the method involving the steps of registering an operating command indicating a requested sideways or bow bollard push function; detecting a current vessel position; registering the current vessel position as a desired vessel position (P1; executing the requested bollard push function; and monitoring the current vessel position (P2; P2") in order to detect a deviation relative to the desired vessel position (P1. If it is detected that a deviation between the desired vessel position has exceeded a predetermined value, then the requested bollard push function is deactivated. The disclosure further relates to a control unit arranged to control a marine vessel and a marine vessel comprising such a control unit.