Bolt Action Firearm Intermittent Push Feed Ejector

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current bolt action firearms either prioritize cartridge feeding control or positive ejection, but not both simultaneously, leading to unreliable operation in manually operated firearms.

Innovation Solution

Incorporating an intermittent push feed ejector into a control feed bolt face, which includes a bolt assembly with a bolt head, an ejector bore, an ejector element, an ejector restraint element, an actuator, and a linkage to ensure both controlled feeding and positive ejection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If controlled round feed is used to allow bolt control of cartridge during feeding, then cartridge feeding control is improved, but ejection reliability deteriorates because it depends on user retraction speed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecartridge feeding controlVSAvoidejection reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The ejector element is designed to be movable between retracted and extended positions, dynamically adapting its function based on the operational phase. During feeding, it remains retracted to allow controlled round feed; during extraction, it extends to provide positive ejection, thus resolving the contradiction between feeding control and ejection reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The ejector element operates periodically, being activated only during the extraction phase when the actuator engages it. This periodic action allows the system to maintain controlled feeding during the loading phase while providing reliable ejection during the extraction phase, addressing both requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

2Reliability

If push round feed is used to allow positive ejection, then ejection reliability is improved, but cartridge feeding control deteriorates because bolt cannot control cartridge during feeding

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveejection reliabilityVSAvoidcartridge feeding control
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The feeding and ejection functions are segmented into different operational phases. The controlled round feed mechanism handles cartridge feeding control during the loading phase, while the ejector element handles positive ejection during the extraction phase. This segmentation allows both functions to operate optimally without interfering with each other

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The actuator serves as an intermediary that coordinates between the feeding mechanism and the ejector element. It remains disengaged during feeding to allow controlled round feed, then engages the ejector element during extraction to enable positive ejection, thus mediating between the two conflicting requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If ejector element is always extended for positive ejection, then ejection reliability is improved, but device complexity increases due to additional restraint mechanisms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveejection reliabilityVSAvoidejector restraint mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The ejector element is spring-biased to automatically extend when needed for ejection and retract when not needed for feeding. This self-service mechanism eliminates the need for complex external restraint systems, as the spring provides automatic positioning based on operational requirements, reducing overall device complexity while maintaining reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution enables reliable and simultaneous control of cartridge feeding and positive ejection, enhancing the operational reliability of manually operated bolt action firearms.

Implementation Method 1

the ejector element being spring biased to the forward position

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring bias: Spring

Data Source

PatentUS20250198713A1Bolt action firearm
Publication Date: 2025.06.19 FRANKLIN ARMORY HOLDINGS INC
  • US20250198713A1 patent drawing
  • US20250198713A1 patent drawing
  • US20250198713A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A bolt action firearm has an ejector element movable between a forward position in which a portion of the ejector element protrudes from the bolt face and a rearward position rear of the forward position, an ejector restraint element operable in a restraining position to restrain the ejector element to the rearward position and in a release position to enable movement of the ejector element from the rearward position to the forward position, an actuator movable between a first position and a second position such that seating a cartridge case head in an aligned position motivates the actuator from the first position to the second position, and a linkage connecting the actuator to the ejector restraint element and operable in response to movement of the actuator from the first position to the second position to enable movement of the ejector element from the rearward position to the forward position.