Bolted Joint Simulator for Dynamic Load Visualization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for teaching mechanical bolted joint design are limited to static, 2-dimensional illustrations, failing to effectively demonstrate dynamic behavior and the effects of varying force inputs, which is crucial for understanding and designing complex mechanical joints in dynamic systems like automobiles and aircraft.

Innovation Solution

A 3-dimensional bolted joint demonstration device and method that includes a two-part bolt with a preload force scale, a compression member, and weights to simulate clamp load and service load, allowing for physical and visual depiction of joint behavior under different conditions, including hard/rigid and soft joints, and varying input forces.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If static, 2-dimensional illustrations are used for teaching mechanical joint design, then the teaching materials are simple to produce and understand, but they fail to demonstrate dynamic behavior and the effects of varying force inputs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of understandingVSAvoidability to demonstrate dynamic behavior
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms static teaching materials into a dynamic demonstration device that physically exhibits joint behavior under varying loads. The model includes movable components that respond to applied forces, allowing observers to see real-time changes in bolt preload, clamp load, and joint deformation, thereby resolving the contradiction between simplicity and dynamic demonstration capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The invention transitions from 2-dimensional illustrations to a 3-dimensional physical model that can be viewed from multiple angles. This dimensional enhancement allows students to observe joint behavior in space and understand the three-dimensional nature of stress distribution and deformation, addressing the limitation of flat diagrams while maintaining educational accessibility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Adaptability or versatility

If a physical, 3-dimensional, dynamic model is created to demonstrate mechanical joint design, then the demonstration of joint behavior under varying forces is enhanced, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to demonstrate joint behaviorVSAvoidcomplexity of demonstration device
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The demonstration device is divided into distinct modular components including the bolt, nut, compression members, preload indicator, and load application mechanism. Each segment performs a specific function and can be independently understood or replaced, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining the ability to demonstrate complex joint behavior

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces intermediary elements such as the preload indicator mechanism and the compression members with varying stiffness that mediate between the applied loads and the observed joint behavior. These intermediaries translate complex mechanical interactions into visible, measurable outputs without requiring the entire system to be overly complex

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Ease of manufacture

If conventional teaching materials are used, then the production cost is low, but the educational effectiveness for understanding dynamic loading and joint stiffness is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction simplicityVSAvoideducational effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The demonstration device creates a simplified copy of an actual bolted joint system that replicates the essential mechanical behaviors without requiring a full-scale industrial joint. By copying the key functional elements and their interactions, the model achieves educational effectiveness while remaining manufacturable and manageable

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enhances understanding of bolt preload, clamp load, angle tightening, and stiffness, aiding in better joint design, assembly, quality control, and failure analysis by providing a hands-on, dynamic model for training and education.

Implementation Method 1

The two-part bolt includes a biasing member which reflects the representative preload on the bolt and displays the preload value on the preload force scale

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

one or more different compression members are used to simulate different types of joints, for example hard/rigid joints and soft/compressible joints

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectStiffness variation: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentEP3707692B1Bolted joint demonstration device and method
Publication Date: 2022.04.13 ATLAS COPCO IND TECHNIQUE AB INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY DEPARTMENT
  • EP3707692B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3707692B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP3707692B1 patent drawingFigure 5~6

AI summary

A bolted joint simulator device and methods include a physical device for visually demonstrating the effects or behavior of a simulated mechanical joint when input forces to the joint are varied. The device and methods are useful to visually demonstrate changes in the bolt preload force and bolt clamp load on the application of service loads to the simulated bolted joint. In one example, a two-part bolt and a biasing device are used to simulate and demonstrate bolt preload and clamp load. A stand is used to simulate the application of service loads on the bolted joint. In one example, both a hard, rigid compression member and a soft semi-compressible compression member are alternately used to demonstrate the effects of varying joint stiffness.