Bond Wire Transformer Parallel Configuration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

State-of-the-art bond wire transformers face inefficiencies due to complex series connections, high resistive losses, and limited predictability of inductive component values, which hinder their use in high-power applications.

Innovation Solution

The transformer design employs a single or half-loop primary bond wire configuration with multiple loop secondary bond wires, connected in parallel to enhance magnetic coupling and turns ratio, reducing resistive losses and increasing power efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Power

If series connections are used to achieve desired turns ratio, then transformer ratio is improved, but resistive losses increase and power efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransformer ratioVSAvoidresistive losses
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple bond wires in parallel configuration to achieve the desired turns ratio, rather than using series connections. This merging approach reduces the total resistance by providing multiple parallel current paths, thereby reducing resistive losses while maintaining the required transformer ratio for power transmission.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of using the conventional series connection approach to achieve turns ratio, the patent inverts the approach by using parallel connections. This inversion fundamentally changes the electrical characteristics, reducing resistive losses while still achieving the desired transformation ratio through the geometric arrangement and magnetic coupling of the parallel bond wires.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

2Reliability

If multiple bond pads are provided for each series connection, then transformer functionality is achieved, but space utilization deteriorates and device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransformer functionalityVSAvoidbond pad arrangements
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple bond wire connections to share common bond pads, thereby reducing the total number of discrete bond pads required. This consolidation maintains the transformer functionality through parallel magnetic coupling while significantly reducing the spatial complexity and number of connection points needed on the substrate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The bond pads in the patent serve multiple functions simultaneously - they act as electrical connections for multiple parallel bond wires, provide magnetic coupling points, and establish the transformer ratio through their geometric arrangement. This multi-functionality reduces the overall device complexity while maintaining full transformer functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Manufacturing precision

If integrated planar technology is used, then manufacturing precision is improved, but quality factor deteriorates due to substrate losses

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefabrication accuracyVSAvoidsubstrate losses
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the bond wires from the substrate plane and forms them as three-dimensional loops or coils above the substrate. This extraction removes the current paths from direct contact with the lossy substrate, eliminating substrate losses while maintaining the manufacturing precision benefits of standard bond wire fabrication techniques.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from two-dimensional planar integration to three-dimensional bond wire structures. By forming vertical loops and coils above the substrate, the current paths occupy a different spatial dimension, reducing coupling with substrate losses while preserving the precision of automated wire bonding manufacturing processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design results in high-quality, high-power transformers with quality factors exceeding 100 at 2.14GHz, overcoming the limitations of integrated planar transformers and enabling efficient high-frequency applications like outphasing amplifiers and power combiners.

Implementation Method 1

each individual pair of adjacent primary and secondary bond wires form a transformer due to the magnetic coupling between them

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic coupling: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

A first set of primary bond wires (1) connected in parallel between first and second metal bonding bars (2, 3). Similarly, a second set of secondary bond wires (4) connected in parallel between third and fourth metal bonding bars (5, 6)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic field: Magnetic Field

Data Source

PatentEP2461335B1Bond wire transformer
Publication Date: 2015.09.23 AMPLEON NETHERLANDS
  • EP2461335B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2461335B1 patent drawingFigure 2a~2c
  • EP2461335B1 patent drawingFigure 3a~3b

AI summary

A bond wire transformer comprises a plurality of primary bond wires (1) coupled in parallel; and a plurality of secondary bond wires (4) coupled in parallel, each secondary bond wire (4) being spaced apart from and oriented relative to a corresponding primary bond wire (1) so as to achieve a desired mutual inductance between the corresponding primary (1) and secondary (4) bond wires, thereby providing magnetic coupling between the primary (1) and secondary (4) bond wires.