Bonding Roll Nub Geometry for Substrate Tear Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing mechanical bonding methods for absorbent articles often damage the laminate web by forming holes and tears at bond sites, leading to defective products and increased susceptibility to tearing and pinholes, especially at high nip pressures.

Innovation Solution

A bonding apparatus with a biased bonding roll and anvil roll that uses chamfered or radiused nubs to create discrete bond regions with reduced strain on substrates, minimizing damage and improving bond strength by controlling nip pressure and heat generation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If mechanical bonding is used with patterned cylinders and high nip pressure, then bond strength is improved, but substrate damage (holes, tears, pinholes) increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebond strengthVSAvoidsubstrate damage
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional sharp-edged pattern elements with rounded nubs that have curved surfaces. This curvature prevents the concentration of stress at sharp edges, thereby reducing substrate damage such as tears and pinholes while maintaining effective bonding through distributed pressure application.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Solution Approach 2:

The bonding apparatus applies pressure locally through discrete nubs rather than through continuous or uniform pressure distribution. Each nub creates a localized bond site with controlled pressure concentration, achieving strong bonds at specific points while leaving surrounding substrate areas undamaged.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Strength

If high nip pressure is applied to bond substrates, then bond strength is improved, but tearing and pinholes in the web increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebond strengthVSAvoidweb integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

Rounded nub surfaces distribute the applied nip pressure more evenly across the substrate, preventing stress concentration that leads to tearing and pinholes. The curved geometry allows high pressure to be applied without creating sharp stress points that would compromise web integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Solution Approach 2:

The rounded nub design inherently cushions the substrate before full pressure is applied, as the curved surface gradually contacts and deforms the substrate material. This progressive compression prevents sudden stress spikes that could cause tearing, while still achieving the necessary pressure for strong bonding.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

3Productivity

If pattern elements with sharp edges are used for bonding, then bonding efficiency is improved, but web damage (tears, cuts, weakness) increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebonding efficiencyVSAvoidweb damage
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The invention replaces sharp-edged pattern elements with rounded nubs that maintain bonding effectiveness while eliminating the cutting and tearing effects caused by sharp edges. The curved surfaces of the nubs deform the substrate material rather than cutting it, preserving web integrity while achieving efficient bonding.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent converts the potentially harmful effect of pressure concentration into a beneficial localized deformation mechanism. The rounded nubs concentrate pressure just enough to create strong bonds through material yielding, while the curved geometry prevents the harmful cutting action that would occur with sharp edges.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution effectively reduces substrate tearing and enhances bond strength, resulting in higher-quality absorbent articles with fewer defects and improved peel force resistance without the use of adhesives.

Implementation Method 1

As substrates advance between the bonding roll and anvil roll, the substrates are compressed between the anvil roll and the bonding surfaces to form a discrete bond region between the substrates

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Implementation Method 2

During the bonding process, some of the yielded material may flow from the bond site to areas surrounding the perimeter of the pattern element

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat generation through compression: Viscous Heating

Data Source

PatentEP3083196B1Bonding apparatus
Publication Date: 2019.04.17 PROCTER & GAMBLE CO
  • EP3083196B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3083196B1 patent drawingFigure 3A~4C
  • EP3083196B1 patent drawingFigure 5

AI summary

The present disclosure relates to methods and apparatuses for mechanically bonding substrates (102,104) together. The apparatus comprises a bonding roll (106) comprising a base surface (120) and plurality of nubs (116) extending from the base surface, each of the plurality of nubs (116) comprising: a sidewall; a bonding surface; and a shoulder connecting the sidewall to the bonding surface. The shoulder comprises a single chamfer or a radius to, inter a//a,reduce tearing of the substrates.