Bone Anchor Closure Thread Geometry for Receiver Arm Splay Limiting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing bone anchor closures, such as v-thread and square thread forms, suffer from splay issues, where the receiver arms of open-ended bone screws flex outwardly under load, leading to deformation and instability in spinal fixation systems.

Innovation Solution

A closure structure with balanced mating guide and advancement flange forms on both the closure and bone anchor arms, featuring a dual-start helically wound design, controls splay by ensuring axial loading and clearance, using a 'boot'-shaped flange form with oblique splay control ramps to lock the receiver arms in place.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If v-thread closure is used, then the closure can be easily advanced into the receiver, but the receiver arms splay outwardly without limit under load

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclosure advancementVSAvoidreceiver arm stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The closure is divided into multiple functional surfaces: a first surface with a first angle for initial engagement and advancement, and a second surface with a second angle for controlling splay. This segmentation allows different portions of the closure to perform different functions - advancement versus splay control - resolving the contradiction between easy advancement and arm stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different portions of the closure have different angular characteristics. The first surface has a steeper angle for effective advancement, while the second surface has a shallower angle to control splay. This local differentiation of geometric properties allows the single closure component to simultaneously achieve easy advancement and prevent arm splay under load.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Stability of the object's composition

If buttress thread form is used, then outward splay of receiver arms is reduced, but the threads can still be bent and deformed by forces during installation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereceiver arm splay controlVSAvoidthread resistance to deformation
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The closure is segmented into multiple angular surfaces that work together: the first angled surface handles advancement forces, while the second angled surface specifically counteracts splay forces. This segmentation distributes the mechanical loads across different surfaces, preventing any single surface from being overloaded and deformed during installation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The solution moves from a single-angle thread form (2D profile) to a multi-surface closure geometry (3D structure with varying angles). By adding the dimension of multiple angular surfaces, the closure can simultaneously resist advancement forces and splay forces, increasing overall strength and deformation resistance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Force

If square thread closure is used, then forces are directed axially, but splay occurs under moderate to heavy loads

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaxial force directionVSAvoidreceiver arm splay under load
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

Different surfaces of the closure have different angular properties optimized for different functions. The first surface with its steeper angle maintains axial force directionality, while the second surface with its shallower angle specifically addresses splay control under load. This local quality differentiation allows the closure to simultaneously achieve axial force direction and splay prevention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The closure geometry is designed to dynamically respond to loading conditions. Under advancement forces, the first surface engages to maintain axial direction. Under splay forces, the second surface engages to control arm separation. This dynamic engagement of different surfaces based on applied loads allows the closure to maintain both axial force direction and arm stability across varying load conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20250345097A1Splay limiting closures for open bone anchor receivers with horizontal curvate extending instrument engaging grooves
Publication Date: 2025.11.13 JACKSON CORP
  • US20250345097A1 patent drawing
  • US20250345097A1 patent drawing
  • US20250345097A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A bone anchor assembly featuring a receiver and a closure. The receiver includes a base portion with a bottom surface and an upper portion with a pair of opposed upwardly extending arms. An open rod-receiving channel is situated between these arms, each arm having an interior surface with a helically wound thread form. A closure is designed to be threadably positioned within the channel. The closure includes a cylindrical body with a central axis and an outer surface featuring a mating helically wound thread form. This thread form includes an outer crest portion, a root portion, a thread pitch, an upper linear thrust surface, and a lower linear clearance surface. The height of the outer crest portion is slightly less than or equal to the height of the root portion.