Bone Anchor Drag Interface for Position Stability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Bone anchors with movable receiver members often experience unintended movement during provisional positioning in orthopedic or neurosurgical procedures, leading to alignment challenges and increased surgical complexity due to the lack of effective stabilization before locking.

Innovation Solution

Incorporation of drag interfaces, such as friction between a shank and a bushing, or between a bushing and a drag ring, along with over-rotation blocking features like grooves or lips, to maintain the relative position of the receiver member with respect to the shank before locking, preventing unintended movement while allowing intended free movement.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If the receiver member is movably-coupled to the shank portion to allow freedom of movement during alignment, then the ease of operation is improved, but the stability of the object's composition deteriorates causing unintended movement and alignment challenges

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of alignmentVSAvoidstability of receiver member position
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

A drag interface is introduced as an intermediary mechanism between the receiver member and shank portion. This drag interface provides controlled resistance to movement, allowing the receiver member to be repositioned when intentionally moved by the user while preventing unintended movement during provisional positioning. The drag interface thus mediates between the need for movability and the need for stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If the receiver member is allowed to move freely during provisional positioning, then the adaptability is improved, but the loss of time increases due to repositioning and user fatigue

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability of positioningVSAvoidsurgical procedure time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The drag interface acts as a mediator that reduces the need for frequent repositioning by maintaining the receiver member in the desired position once placed. This decreases surgical procedure time by eliminating the need for continuous adjustment or assistant support during rod introduction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Stability of the object's composition

If the receiver member is constrained to prevent movement, then the stability of the object's composition is improved, but the ease of operation deteriorates due to difficulty in alignment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestability of receiver member positionVSAvoidease of alignment
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The drag interface provides dynamic resistance to movement rather than fixed constraint. It allows the receiver member to move when intentionally repositioned by the user while preventing unintended movement during provisional positioning. This dynamic behavior enables both stability and ease of alignment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The drag interfaces and over-rotation blocking features ensure stable alignment and reduce surgical complexity by maintaining the desired position of the receiver member, thereby reducing user fatigue and procedural time.

Implementation Method 1

a drag ring that applies a frictional force to the bushing, the drag ring being disposed in a groove formed in the receiver member

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Implementation Method 2

The bushing can exert a frictional force on the head of the shank

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Implementation Method 3

friction generated by a biased saddle

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS11026730B2Bone anchors with drag features and related methods
Publication Date: 2021.06.08 MEDOS INT SARL
  • US11026730B2 patent drawing
  • US11026730B2 patent drawing
  • US11026730B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Bone anchors and related methods are disclosed herein. In some embodiments, a bone anchor can include a drag interface. Exemplary drag interfaces include (i) friction between a shank and a bushing, (ii) friction between a bushing and a drag ring, (iii) friction generated by a biased saddle, and (iv) combinations of the above. The drag interface can help maintain the relative position between a receiver member and a shank of the bone anchor prior to locking the bone anchor, preventing unintended movement while still allowing free movement when intended by the user. In some embodiments, a bone anchor can include over-rotation blocking features, such as a groove, lip, or protrusion formed on a bushing of the bone anchor. Various other bone anchor features are also disclosed, including high aspect ratio drag rings and compressible drag posts.