Robotic Bone Cutting Feed Rate Control at Tissue Transitions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing robotic surgical systems struggle to seamlessly switch between semi-autonomous and manual modes of operation during a single procedure, particularly when transitioning between different types of bone structures like cortical and cancellous bone, and to prevent instrument collision with undesired objects at the surgical site.

Innovation Solution

A surgical system with a robotic arm and sensor that adjusts feed rates based on sensed forces/torques to navigate predefined tool paths, allowing manual or semi-autonomous operation, and prevents instrument movement beyond defined boundaries.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If the robotic system operates in semi-autonomous mode with a preprogrammed path, then the instrument can move along a defined path with high accuracy, but the system cannot adapt to real-time tissue transitions between cortical and cancellous bone

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepositioning accuracyVSAvoidadaptability to tissue transitions
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The robotic system incorporates sensors that provide real-time feedback on tissue characteristics during instrument advancement. This feedback loop enables the control system to detect transitions between cortical and cancellous bone and dynamically adjust operational parameters, resolving the contradiction between maintaining preprogrammed path accuracy and adapting to real-time tissue variations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from a static, preprogrammed path approach to a dynamic control mode where feed rate and other parameters are continuously adjusted based on real-time sensor data. This dynamic adaptation allows the system to maintain positioning accuracy while responding to tissue transitions, combining the benefits of both preprogrammed precision and real-time adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If the robotic system uses a fixed feed rate for instrument advancement, then the system operation is simple, but the system cannot optimize cutting performance across different bone densities

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting efficiencyVSAvoidfeed rate control complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically changes the feed rate parameter based on detected bone density and tissue characteristics. By automatically adjusting this critical parameter in response to sensor feedback, the system optimizes cutting efficiency across different bone types without requiring complex manual intervention, balancing productivity improvement with acceptable system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The robotic system performs self-adjustment of feed rate based on its own sensor measurements of tissue properties. This self-service capability eliminates the need for constant practitioner intervention to optimize cutting parameters, improving productivity while keeping the control system complexity manageable through automated decision-making algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Adaptability or versatility

If the practitioner manually controls the instrument position in real-time, then the system can adapt to tissue variations, but positioning accuracy decreases due to human factors like muscle strain and twitching

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereal-time adaptabilityVSAvoidpositioning accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The robotic system acts as an intermediary between the practitioner's intent and the actual instrument manipulation. The robot executes precise movements while sensors detect tissue variations, combining machine precision with adaptive decision-making. This intermediary role eliminates the direct connection between human physiological limitations and positioning accuracy while maintaining real-time adaptability through sensor feedback.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Productivity

If the robotic system operates autonomously without practitioner input, then the procedure efficiency is high, but the system cannot respond to unexpected conditions or prevent collisions with undesired objects

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocedure efficiencyVSAvoidsafety and collision prevention
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates multiple sensor feedback mechanisms that continuously monitor the surgical environment for unexpected conditions and potential collisions. This feedback enables the autonomous system to detect and respond to safety concerns in real-time, maintaining high procedure efficiency while ensuring reliability through automated safety monitoring and practitioner alert systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables precise and safe instrument movement by adapting feed rates and preventing collisions, enhancing surgical precision and safety during bone manipulation.

Implementation Method 1

A sensor senses forces/torques applied to the energy applicator

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectForce sensing: Force

Data Source

PatentUS20260047906A1Robotic Surgical System And Method With Dynamic Feed Rate Control Based On Sensed Tissue Transition
Publication Date: 2026.02.19 STRYKER CORP
  • US20260047906A1 patent drawing
  • US20260047906A1 patent drawing
  • US20260047906A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Surgical systems and methods for manipulation of an anatomy that includes cortical and cancellous bone. A surgical manipulator has a robotic arm to move an instrument with an energy applicator. A sensor senses forces/torques applied to the energy applicator. Controller(s) obtain a tool path for the energy applicator to traverse. A segment of the tool path transitions into, or between, cortical bone and cancellous bone. The controller(s) control the manipulator to advance the energy applicator along the tool path according to a first feed rate to manipulate the cortical or cancellous bone and detect, with the sensor, a change in the forces/torques being indicative of the transition. In response to detection of this change, the controller(s) control the manipulator to advance the energy applicator along the tool path according to a second feed rate, greater/less than the first feed rate.