Bone Repositioning Guide System for Bunion Correction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current surgical procedures for correcting bunions, such as the Lapidus bunionectomy, are invasive, lack control over rotation and angle adjustments of the metatarsal bone, rely on in-surgery trial-and-error, and lack customization for individual patient foot conditions, leading to suboptimal outcomes and prolonged recovery times.

Innovation Solution

A method and kit for correcting bone alignment using a guide system with cannulas and k-wires that allow precise re-alignment and stabilization of bones, including the use of virtual modeling to create customized guides for each patient's unique anatomy, enabling accurate pre-planned resections and improved surgical precision.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If traditional Lapidus bunionectomy is performed, then the bunion can be corrected, but the procedure is invasive and lacks control over rotation and angle adjustments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebone realignment precisionVSAvoidguide system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The guide system is designed and positioned before the actual bone resection and realignment. The guide includes pre-configured cannulas and k-wires that establish the desired bone alignment geometry in advance, allowing the surgeon to follow a pre-planned correction path rather than making adjustments during the invasive procedure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The guide system acts as an intermediary tool between the surgeon's intent and the actual bone realignment. It includes a guide body with cannulas that receive k-wires, which in turn guide the resection and realignment process. This intermediary structure provides controlled access and positioning without requiring direct manual manipulation of the bones during critical alignment steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Loss of time

If traditional surgical methods are used, then bone correction can be achieved, but recovery time is prolonged

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverecovery timeVSAvoidsurgical procedure simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

Virtual modeling is performed before surgery to create a patient-specific treatment plan. The guide system is designed based on this pre-planned geometry, allowing the actual surgical execution to follow a predetermined path. This reduces intraoperative decision-making time and enables more precise, faster correction with potentially quicker recovery.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Adaptability or versatility

If traditional surgical procedures are performed, then bunion correction is possible, but customization for individual patient anatomy is lacking

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepatient-specific customizationVSAvoidguide system design complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The guide system is designed with patient-specific anatomy in mind. The virtual modeling creates a customized treatment plan that accounts for the individual patient's bone geometry, joint positioning, and deformity characteristics. The physical guide is then manufactured or configured to match these specific local anatomical features, providing tailored correction rather than a one-size-fits-all approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

Virtual modeling creates a digital copy or representation of the patient's actual anatomy. This virtual model is used to plan the correction and design the guide system. The guide essentially becomes a physical manifestation of the virtual plan, transferring the digital customization into the physical surgical tool that will correct the patient's specific deformity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

4Measurement precision

If traditional methods are used, then surgery can be performed, but control over rotation and angle adjustments is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveangle and rotation controlVSAvoidguide system structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The desired angle and rotation parameters are calculated and locked into the guide design before surgery. The virtual modeling phase determines the exact correction geometry, and this geometry is embodied in the physical guide's cannula orientations and k-wire positions. During surgery, these pre-set parameters provide automatic control over the final bone alignment without requiring complex intraoperative measurements or adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20230043795A1Bone repositioning guide system and procedure
Publication Date: 2023.02.09 CROSSROADS EXTREMITY SYSTEMS LLC
  • US20230043795A1 patent drawing
  • US20230043795A1 patent drawing
  • US20230043795A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A surgical system and procedure are provided for correcting a deformity between first and second bones using an alignment guide based on a correction factor. The alignment guide is used to insert one or more k-wires into each of the first and second bones in a deformed configuration. A correction guide is passed along the k-wires to rotate and/or translate the first bone relative to the second bone into the corrected configuration. An auxiliary correction guide can be passed along the k-wires to further rotate and/or translate the first bone relative to the second bone from the corrected configuration to an adjusted configuration.