Bone Strength Analysis Using Finite Element Thresholds

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current clinical tests for osteoporosis, such as DEXA and BCT, face challenges in identifying patients at high risk of fracture, particularly those with osteopenia, due to the lack of a credible and robust interventional threshold value for bone strength, which hinders widespread clinical adoption and patient compliance with treatments.

Innovation Solution

A system and method using non-invasive structural analysis of bones from clinical scans, combining finite element analysis with a predetermined interventional threshold value for 'fragile-bone-strength' based on established BMD thresholds, to classify patients and generate intuitive medical reports that enhance patient understanding and treatment adherence.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If DEXA or BCT tests are used to identify patients at high risk of fracture, then bone strength assessment is provided, but the lack of credible interventional threshold values limits their widespread clinical adoption

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefracture risk identification accuracyVSAvoidclinical adoption widespreadness
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms bone strength assessment from research-only to clinically applicable by changing the parameter framework - establishing specific interventional threshold values (e.g., hip strength < 3000 N, vertebral strength < 4500 N) that convert continuous measurement data into discrete clinical decision points, enabling widespread adoption while maintaining reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces finite element analysis as an intermediary computational model that bridges the gap between raw clinical scan data and clinically actionable fracture risk assessment, translating complex biomechanical calculations into standardized threshold-based recommendations that clinicians can universally apply

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If fracture outcome studies are conducted to establish interventional threshold values, then credible threshold values are obtained, but the process requires extensive time and expense

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethreshold value credibilityVSAvoidthreshold calibration duration
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary computational work by using finite element analysis on existing clinical scan data to establish threshold values before widespread clinical implementation, pre-calculating and validating strength thresholds (e.g., 3000 N for hip, 4500 N for vertebra) so that clinical practitioners can immediately apply these pre-established values without conducting their own fracture outcome studies

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a computational model that replicates the complex biomechanical relationships observed in fracture outcome studies, using finite element analysis to copy and simulate the mechanical behavior of bone under various loading conditions, thereby deriving threshold values without requiring actual long-term fracture follow-up studies

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Ease of operation

If only BMD measurements are used for osteoporosis diagnosis, then the test is simple and widely available, but patients with osteopenia are missed despite being at high fracture risk

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediagnosis simplicityVSAvoidhigh risk patient identification
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple assessment dimensions - merging traditional BMD measurements with finite element analysis-derived bone strength metrics to create a composite assessment framework that maintains the simplicity of BMD testing while adding the reliability of structural strength analysis, enabling identification of high-risk patients across both osteoporosis and osteopenia ranges

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Data Source

PatentUS11850061B2Clinical assessment of fragile bone strength
Publication Date: 2023.12.26 ON DIAGNOSTICS LLC
  • US11850061B2 patent drawing
  • US11850061B2 patent drawing
  • US11850061B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for the use of the results from a structural analysis of a patient's bone from a clinical scan, to be used clinically to manage patients in a widespread and consistent fashion.