Book-Like Packaging Structure for Blister Pack Protection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current blister pack packaging is vulnerable to damage and child access, leading to product contamination, displacement, and loss, especially with tobacco-based products that are hygroscopic and require child-resistant measures.

Innovation Solution

A book-like packaging structure with inner blister pack retainers and a cover that includes apertures for secure retention and display, formed from a single sheet of stock, providing a child-resistant and tamper-evident solution for packaging multiple tablets.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If blister packs are made from thin plastic or laminate material, then convenience of use and ease of manufacture are improved, but vulnerability to impact and abrasion damage increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of manufactureVSAvoidvulnerability to damage
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The blister pack is nested within a rigid outer packaging structure that provides mechanical protection. The inner blister pack containing the tablets is placed inside a sturdy box or container that shields it from impact and abrasion during handling and transport, while maintaining the original blister pack's ease of manufacture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

The packaging system combines multiple materials with different properties: the thin plastic or laminate blister pack for flexibility and ease of manufacture, combined with a rigid outer packaging material for protection against damage. This composite packaging structure leverages the advantages of each material while compensating for their individual weaknesses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Ease of operation

If the backing layer is made frangible for easy tablet removal, then ease of operation is improved, but vulnerability to unintentional pack rupture increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidunintentional pack rupture
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The backing layer is designed with differentiated properties: frangible in specific localized areas to allow easy tablet removal where needed, while maintaining structural integrity in other areas to prevent unintentional rupture. The frangibility is concentrated at designated break points rather than distributed throughout the entire backing layer.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The backing layer is segmented into frangible zones and non-frangible zones. The frangible portions are designed to break only at specific locations and under specific conditions (such as applied pressure on individual tablets), while the rest of the backing layer remains intact to protect the tablets from accidental damage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Reliability

If additional packaging elements are added for child resistance and information display, then protection and information provision are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechild resistanceVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple functions are merged into a single integrated packaging structure. The child-resistant features, information display areas, and tablet protection functions are combined into one cohesive packaging design rather than separate components. This reduces overall complexity while maintaining all required functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The packaging structure is designed to perform multiple functions simultaneously: it provides child resistance through integrated locking mechanisms, displays required information on its surfaces, protects the tablets from damage, and maintains ease of tablet access. This multi-functional design avoids the need for separate components for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS8567606B2Book-like packaging structure for receiving a blister pack
Publication Date: 2013.10.29 PHILIP MORRIS USA INC
  • US8567606B2 patent drawing
  • US8567606B2 patent drawing
  • US8567606B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A book-like packaging structure for receiving at least one blister pack having at least one receptacle. The book-like packaging structure includes at least one inner blister pack retainer for receiving the at least one blister pack, the at least one inner blister pack retainer having an inner edge, an outer edge, a first retainer portion and a second retainer portion, said second retainer portion adjacent an inner spine panel having a width equal to or greater than the depth of the at least one receptacle; and a cover for enclosing the at least one inner blister pack retainer, the cover having a first cover portion having an inner edge, a second cover portion having an inner edge and a spine, the spine joined to the inner edge of the first cover portion and the inner edge of the second cover portion, wherein the inner spine panel rests against the spine such that the inner edge of the at least one inner blister pack retainer is positioned adjacent to the spine of the cover. A method of making a book-like packaging structure is also provided.