Engine Boost Pressure Control via Segmented Reference and Disturbance Rejection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing engine control systems face challenges in rapidly responding to boost pressure increases while minimizing engine pumping work, leading to suboptimal fuel efficiency and increased turbocharger lag.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a control system that combines a reference control system without integral feedback with a disturbance rejection control system that includes integral feedback, allowing for adjusted engine states and reduced error between desired and actual engine conditions, thereby improving response and efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a linear control with integral feedback is applied to control boost pressure, then the boost pressure can be regulated, but the engine pumping work increases during transient operating conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveboost pressure controlVSAvoidengine pumping work
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The control system is segmented into two independent controllers: a reference controller that generates the desired boost pressure trajectory without integral feedback, and a disturbance rejection controller that handles deviations from the reference using integral feedback. This segmentation allows each controller to specialize in one function, preventing the integral term from causing excessive pumping work during transient conditions while still maintaining accurate boost pressure regulation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The disturbance rejection controller uses integral feedback to eliminate steady-state errors between the actual and reference boost pressure. The integral term accumulates past errors and adjusts the control output accordingly, ensuring that boost pressure accurately follows the reference trajectory without requiring the reference controller itself to use integral action, thus avoiding the pumping work penalty.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Speed

If boost pressure response is increased to reduce turbocharger lag, then the response speed improves, but engine pumping work increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveboost pressure responseVSAvoidengine pumping work
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The reference controller generates a pre-calculated boost pressure trajectory that anticipates the desired response. By planning the reference path in advance based on driver input and operating conditions, the system achieves rapid boost response without requiring aggressive real-time control actions that would increase pumping work. The reference trajectory is optimized to balance response speed with energy efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11220970B1System and method for controlling boost pressure
Publication Date: 2022.01.11 FORD GLOBAL TECH LLC
  • US11220970B1 patent drawing
  • US11220970B1 patent drawing
  • US11220970B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems for an engine controller are described. In one example, the engine controller includes a reference control system and a disturbance rejection control system. The engine controller avoids use of integral feedback in the reference control system, while permitting integral feedback in the disturbance rejection control system, to improve controller response without unduly increasing engine pumping work.