Booster Charger Feedback Gain Tuning for Stable EV Charging

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing chargers for battery electric vehicles face interference issues due to the electrical characteristics of the power supply, which can lead to voltage and current fluctuations during feedback control, affecting charging efficiency and stability.

Innovation Solution

The charger incorporates a controller with a feedback module, a feedforward module, and a driver that adjusts the switching element's operation to match the target voltage, while determining a feedback gain to separate the control peak frequency from the disturbance peak frequency, thereby reducing interference from the power supply's characteristics.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a feedback module is used to control the booster circuit voltage, then the voltage control precision is improved, but voltage and current fluctuations occur due to interference with power supply electrical characteristics

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevoltage control precisionVSAvoidvoltage stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The controller performs frequency sweeping of the target voltage before actual charging to identify the disturbance peak frequency on the Bode diagram. This preliminary action allows the system to detect power supply electrical characteristics in advance and adjust control parameters accordingly, preventing interference issues during actual operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The controller adjusts the feedback gain parameter based on the identified disturbance peak frequency. By changing the feedback gain, the control peak frequency is shifted to avoid overlapping with the disturbance peak frequency, thereby resolving the interference between feedback control and power supply electrical characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Speed

If the feedback gain is increased to improve control response, then the control speed is improved, but interference with power supply characteristics increases causing larger fluctuations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol response speedVSAvoidinterference with power supply characteristics
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses frequency response analysis through Bode diagrams to understand how the power supply characteristics affect the control system. By analyzing the disturbance transfer function and control transfer function in the frequency domain, the controller can optimize feedback gain to achieve fast response while avoiding resonant frequencies that cause interference.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If frequency sweeping is performed to identify disturbance peak frequency, then the ability to avoid interference is improved, but the charging preparation time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterference avoidance capabilityVSAvoidcharging preparation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The frequency sweeping process covers only the necessary frequency range to identify the disturbance peak frequency, rather than performing a complete system characterization. This partial action approach achieves the essential goal of interference avoidance while minimizing the time required for preparation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20250125643A1charger
Publication Date: 2025.04.17 TOYOTA JIDOSHA KK
  • US20250125643A1 patent drawing
  • US20250125643A1 patent drawing
  • US20250125643A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The charger includes a controller for controlling the booster circuit. The controller includes a FB module, a FF module, and a driver. The controller (1) identifies the disturbance peak frequency on the board diagram of the disturbance transfer function from the target voltage to the current flowing through the reactor by sweeping the target voltage while setting FB command to zero, and (2) determines FB gain included in FB module such that the difference between the control peak frequency on the board diagram of the control transfer function of the controller and the disturbance peak frequency is larger than the predetermined threshold frequency width when it is assumed that the ideal power supply is connected to the low voltage terminal.