Bootstrap Capacitor Charging Circuit Using Comparator Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional voltage converters face inefficiencies in charging bootstrap capacitors due to high dropout voltage from external Zener diodes and additional switching losses from transistors, lacking adjustability and requiring extra components like diodes and compensation capacitors.

Innovation Solution

A circuit with a pair of transistors and a comparator is used to control the charging of a bootstrap capacitor, where the comparator compares a feedback voltage with a reference voltage to determine when to charge the capacitor, avoiding external diodes and compensation circuits, and utilizing MOSFETs or JFETs for efficient switching.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If an external Zener diode is used to charge the bootstrap capacitor, then the capacitor can be charged with reverse current prevention, but the dropout voltage increases and maximum gate voltage decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereverse current preventionVSAvoidmaximum gate voltage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the external Zener diode from the system and replaces it with an internal transistor-based charging circuit. This extraction eliminates the voltage drop associated with the Zener diode's breakdown voltage, thereby increasing the maximum gate voltage available while maintaining reverse current prevention through the transistor's controlled operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the passive Zener diode mechanism with an active transistor-based voltage regulation system. The transistor Q1, controlled by the comparator output, actively manages the charging process, providing precise control over the bootstrap capacitor charging while avoiding the fixed voltage drop of the Zener diode.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Strength

If a transistor is used to replace the Zener diode for charging the bootstrap capacitor, then the dropout voltage is reduced and maximum gate voltage is increased, but switching losses increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemaximum gate voltageVSAvoidswitching loss
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a comparator that continuously monitors the voltage across the bootstrap capacitor and provides feedback control to the transistor Q1. This feedback mechanism ensures the transistor switches only when necessary (when capacitor voltage drops below a threshold), minimizing unnecessary switching events and reducing switching losses while maintaining adequate gate voltage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The transistor Q1 operates in a periodic manner, switching on only when the bootstrap capacitor voltage drops below the reference voltage threshold and switching off when the capacitor is sufficiently charged. This periodic operation, controlled by the comparator feedback, reduces switching frequency and associated losses compared to continuous switching arrangements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Loss of energy

If linear regulation is used to reduce switching loss, then switching loss decreases, but additional components like compensation capacitors are required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveswitching lossVSAvoidnumber of components
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the need for external compensation capacitors and complex linear regulation circuits by using a simple comparator-based feedback system. The comparator inherently provides the necessary regulation without requiring additional compensation components, thus reducing device complexity while maintaining low switching losses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The comparator-based control system automatically regulates the bootstrap capacitor charging without requiring external compensation networks. The system self-adjusts the transistor switching based on the capacitor voltage feedback, eliminating the need for additional compensation capacitors that would be required in traditional linear regulation approaches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Device complexity

If the diode is placed inside the controller chip, then the system design is simplified and external components are reduced, but the voltage produced by the diode is greater causing lower maximum voltage to the boot pin

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of external componentsVSAvoidmaximum gate voltage
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the bootstrap capacitor charging function with the existing internal transistor Q1 and comparator resources within the controller chip. By combining these functions and eliminating the need for a separate internal Zener diode structure, the design achieves both component integration and adequate voltage delivery to the boot pin.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the diode-based internal charging mechanism with a transistor-based controlled charging circuit. This substitution allows for active voltage regulation that can maintain adequate voltage levels at the boot pin while keeping the charging circuit integrated within the controller chip, avoiding the fixed voltage drop inherent in diode-based solutions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution reduces dropout voltage, minimizes switching losses, and eliminates the need for external components, providing a wider bandwidth and increased system stability by using a hysteretic comparator for efficient bootstrap capacitor charging.

Implementation Method 1

a comparator compares a feedback voltage drawn from a feedback node between the pair of transistors with a reference voltage, to control the second transistor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVoltage comparison:

Implementation Method 2

a bootstrap capacitor CBootstrap connected between the high-side power input Boot of the high-side driver 102 and the source of the high-side transistor 14

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCapacitance: Capacitance

Data Source

PatentUS7741901B2Circuit for charging a bootstrap capacitor in a voltage converter
Publication Date: 2010.06.22 RICHTEK TECH
  • US7741901B2 patent drawing
  • US7741901B2 patent drawing
  • US7741901B2 patent drawing

AI summary

For charging a bootstrap capacitor in a voltage converter, a circuit is provided for wider bandwidth to eliminate the feedback stability issue and pin out for compensation circuit. A pair of transistors are connected in series between a power input and the bootstrap capacitor, the first transistor is switched synchronously with a low-side transistor of the voltage converter, and a comparator compares a feedback voltage drawn from a feedback node between the pair of transistors with a reference voltage, to control the second transistor to determine to charge the bootstrap capacitor.