Border Control Rules Engine for Pre-Arrival Travel Authorization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing border control systems face inefficiencies in handling increasing passenger numbers and responding to emerging threats, leading to delays and labor-intensive adjustments in border security protocols.

Innovation Solution

A border control system that dynamically configures security protocols using a processor, rules engine, and configurable ruleset to analyze passenger information and journey data, enabling automated threat testing and travel authorization decisions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual border control checks are conducted for each passenger, then security accuracy is improved, but processing time increases and productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity accuracyVSAvoidpassenger processing throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary border control assessments by evaluating passenger information, journey details, and threat indicators before the passenger arrives at the border. The rules engine pre-determines travel outcomes and generates travel authorizations in advance, so that when passengers arrive at border control, the security assessment has already been completed, enabling rapid verification rather than full manual inspection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical border control processes with an automated electronic system. The rules engine, processor, and database systems substitute for human border control agents in performing security assessments, applying configurable rulesets to passenger data automatically. This mechanical substitution enables high-speed processing while maintaining consistent security evaluation criteria.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If border security protocols are manually adjusted in response to threats, then security responsiveness is improved, but implementation time and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity responsivenessVSAvoidprotocol adjustment implementation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs dynamically configurable rulesets that can be modified in real-time in response to emerging threats. The rules engine allows border control authorities to update security parameters, threat indicators, and evaluation criteria without system reconfiguration or downtime. This dynamic capability enables immediate response to security events, such as updating threat databases or adjusting risk thresholds, while the system continues to operate with updated parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements security protocol adjustments through parameter changes in the configurable ruleset. Rather than manually rewriting security protocols, the system modifies specific parameters such as threat weightings, passenger risk thresholds, and evaluation criteria within the rules engine. These parameter changes are applied automatically by the processor, enabling rapid security protocol updates in response to emerging threats without the time-consuming process of manual protocol redesign.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP4700694A1Border control system and process
Publication Date: 2026.02.25 SITA ADVANCED TRAVEL SOLUTIONS LTD
  • EP4700694A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4700694A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4700694A1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

There is provided a border control system and method for determining whether a passenger is authorised to travel to a destination in advance of the passenger completing a passenger journey. The method comprises determining, with a rules engine having a configurable ruleset, a travel outcome for each location in a travel plan. The rules engine determines the travel outcome by applying the configurable ruleset to passenger related information and/or passenger journey information. Each travel outcome is then used to determine a travel authorisation for the passenger, which either approves or denies a passenger travel request.